"Who Killed The Electric Car?" movie review
The documentary film on GM's controversial electric vehicle program, "Who Killed The Electric Car?" makes it to more theaters this week. We've written a lot about the film's contents – including an interview with Chelsea Sexton, who plays a major role in the story the movie tells – but what about the movie itself? I've seen it, and here's a brief review.The basic structure of the film is that the death of GM's EV1 was a murder, and the film acts as a Jessica Fletcher type investigating all the suspects, from automobile manufacturers to consumers to the oil industry. This style makes the already dramatic tale more interesting, but doesn't help come to any conclusions since director Chris Paine assigns a lot of blame by the end of the film.
One of the best parts of the film is the confrontational scene where a group of protestors – well, it's a bit strange to call them protestors but they're certainly more than just customers, they're, um, the world's biggest EV1 fans – take a stand outside a parking lot where a bunch of EV1s are being held for mysterious reasons. At the beginning, the group just keeps watch and tries to figure out what's going on, then they stage clever events to get the media's attention, and finally some of the fans need to be taken away in police cars when the EV1s are schlepped off to the desert. It's not just that the film treats these activists with respect, it's that it takes the time to show you why they're doing what they're doing. This is uncommon in films or TV shows today, and Paine deserves praise for this.
Overall, "Who Killed The Electric Car?" is a good tale. It tells an interesting story, and I was left with a surprisingly pleased feeling after watching the film. The scenes where perfectly good EV1s are crushed into dust are disturbing, but seeing how passionate people can be about doing right by the environment is uplifting.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Candy 4:05PM (7/13/2006)
I supposed film had to be documental. And they made it pulp fiction. Ffff
Reply
Raptop 9:46AM (7/14/2006)
So did they mention that the charging station had a tendency to cause house fires? Or was that glossed over?
Reply
shiznannigan 1:54PM (7/14/2006)
Was Toyota's cancellation of the Rav-4 EV program covered as well, or did that one manage to slip under the radar (Not that it would be a big surprise...)
Reply
Sebastian 10:23AM (7/16/2006)
Any fires caused by the electric fueling stations were not mentioned. And the RAV4 EV program? Hmm, it may have been mentioned but only very briefly. The focus was most certainly the EV1.
Reply
Kevin 11:51AM (7/16/2006)
After seeing the movie, my biggest complaint is about the government regulators with their unrealistic emissions standards that caused a rebellion among the electric car automakers.
I'm also very curious about a recent statement that the GM CEO made about hybrid-electric vehicles not having a bright future (he says ethanol is the way to go).
There more info on this here: http://www.hydrogen-cars.biz/blog/2006/06/general-motors-onboard-ethanol-to.html
How can a company manufacture a fine electric vehicle such as the EV-1 and then a few short years later saying hybrid-electric vehicles don't make sense for the future? Hybrids save fuel - whether its gasoline, diesel, ethanol, bio-fuels or hydrogen. Is GM trying to kill the hybrid-electric vehicle as well?
Reply