Lightning Car Co to use Altairnano batteries in new sports car

Click the photo for a high-res gallery of the Lightning GT
Another British specialist car maker has popped up with a new electrically driven sports car. With styling that looks like a Jaguar from the front, a more recent TVR from the rear and a Marcos in profile, the new Lightning GT is set to be powered by Altairnano's Nanosafe batteries. The all new chassis uses aluminum honey comb and composite in its construction.
A three model lineup is planned that includes a luxury model, a lightweight sport version that goes 0-60 in under four seconds and an extended range model that can run 250 miles on a charge. Lightning is using Hi-Pa Drive wheel motors from PML Flightlink with a combined output of 700hp
Right now the company is taking orders with production expected to start in 2008. The Lightning press release is after the jump. As soon as we get some more information from Lightning we'll pass it along.
UDATE: More details on the Lightning GT, Not here and not cheap!
Gallery: Lightning GT
[Source: Lightning Car Company, thanks to Wouter for the tip]
NEWS RELEASE
The Lightning Car Company today announced its development of a range of 700 bhp Lightning electric cars, for the first time genuinely harnessing electric motive power and uniting it with class-leading sports car design, engineering and production.
The remarkable car range has been conceived to satisfy three essential criteria, namely to deliver a highly stylised, graceful sports car with cues hinting at the quintessential British treatment of Aston Martin or TVR while delivering an explosive, dynamic performance based on new breakthrough electric technologies that make the ownership experience quicker, easier and cleaner than traditionally fuelled cars.
The Lightning Car Company draws upon 25 years of automotive experience from design and engineering personnel whose industry experience includes McLaren, Lola, Ronart and Vanwall, as well as championing the adoption and use of new generation electric battery and motor technologies derived from application in the aerospace industry. The business owners jointly share a clear vision of an electric-powered future for high performance motoring.
The Lightning began life as a traditionally powered petrol vehicle in order to develop the car's chassis dynamics. Battery and motor technology applications allow the handling characteristics of the car to be optimised. The chassis derives its inherent dynamic quality from its aluminium honeycomb and carbon composite monocoque structure, essentially a Formula One derived concept that blends low mass with high impact qualities.
Arthur Wolstenholme, Technical Director at Lightning explains, "Ten, or perhaps even five years ago, electric power was dismissed as a poor substitute for petrol, diesel or LPG. But the world has moved on significantly – from military and aerospace applications, electric motor and battery technologies have been developed that will enable the Lightning to demonstrate 700 plus bhp performance over a range that exceeds some of today's petrol performance cars. What's more, the Lightning is intended to compete with premium market sport cars, but our electric power should outstrip the response rates, torque characteristics and driveability of most exotic performance super cars. Electric power has truly arrived in the performance market."
The Lightning is set to dismiss all the preconceptions about electric power. It will be there immediately, and in abundance, providing amazing responsiveness. And, with a chassis designed to be more than capable dynamically, will make a great point to point proposition to rival the established guard.
The Lightning will combine high performance electric motive power with an advanced regenerative energy system that recharges the car's batteries under braking by capturing lost friction energy. This emerging technology utilised by Lightning in the road car sector will be adopted by Formula One from 2008 when KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems) become mandatory. The Lightning's use of this technology enables the range of the car to be extended to over 250 miles/400km.
With concourse elegance, blistering performance (expected to be a 0-60 time of sub 4 seconds) and a ten minute charge time to sustain a 250 mile range, the ownership costs of the Lightning range are set to be significantly lower than traditional fossil fuelled vehicles, with exemption from road tax, congestion charging and an urban cycle energy cost estimated at 2.2p per mile, the Lightning could be as much as £10,000 per year cheaper to run than a Audi RS4 based on an average 20,000 miles of motoring.
There are 3 Lightning models planned, a Grand Tourer, a competent and quick car which maintains a depth of luxury and specification; the Lightning Sport is the GT's lightweight, purposeful cousin, with the ability to achieve 0-60 in under 4 seconds. The third Lightning will be an extended range model, with the capability of reaching an estimated 250 miles on a single 10 minute charge.
The electric Lightning prototypes are now in development and pre-orders are being taken for 2008 delivery. Customised options for interior and exterior finishes and accessories will be available on a build to order basis.
THE ELECTRIC LIGHTNING - TOP 10 FEATURES
Ultra smooth 100% electric power (700+bhp) immediately from zero rpm
10 minute charge time for over 250 miles of motoring (GTSE model)
Uncompromising performance with 0-60mph in less than 4 seconds (GTS model)
State of the art NanoSafe™ battery system and Hi-Pa Drive™ electric motor technology
Full regenerative braking so the battery receives charge every time you slow down, travel downhill or simply coast
Commanding presence of carbon fibre/Kevlar hand-crafted bodywork
Clean technology means no congestion charge or road tax and the ultimate A grade green rating
Phenomenal economy up to 10 x cheaper to run than petrol
Safer with no large fuel tank, thermally stable batteries and a bodywork structure similar to that used in F1 to protect the driver
Luxury spec. interior – incorporating sat nav, ipod interface and virtual engine sound
MORE ABOUT ELECTRIC LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY
NanoSafe™ from Altairnano Inc.
Until now, battery technology has hindered electric vehicle innovation. In 2000, US company Altairnano Inc. established a research programme to create an ultra safe, high power battery using cutting-edge Nanotechnology. The result of their hard work is the NanoSafe™ battery.
SAFER - NanoSafe™ batteries use nano titanate materials instead of graphite which makes them far more thermally stable - there are no toxics or heavy metals used in NanoSafe™ batteries.
LONGER-LASTING - NanoSafe™ batteries have a life expectancy of 12+ years, versus the 3-5 year life of other batteries. NanoSafe™ can retain up to 85% charge capacity after 15,000 charges.
FASTER CHARGE - NanoSafe™ batteries can be recharged in approximately 10 minutes, rather than the hours required by many other rechargeable batteries.
MORE POWERFUL - With instantaneous power even at extreme temperatures, NanoSafe™ batteries deliver power per unit weight and unit volume several times that of conventional Lithium-Ion batteries.
Hi-Pa Drive™ from PML Flightlink Ltd
Hi-Pa Drive™ is a real revolution in motor technology and it's a British innovation to boot! With its integrated motor and drive electronics in one single unit it produces an ultra high power density - up to 20 times more than conventional systems.
The compact, energy-efficient, electric wheel motors produce unrivalled levels of torque with internal heavy-duty tapered roller bearings that can withstand heavy radial loads for robust use. Yet they achieve the power to weight ratio important for the performance sports car capability of the Lightning
Other features include total weather proofing, total energy transfer and several levels of redundancy, so any single failure will not prevent the vehicle from operating safely.
Carbon fibre/Kevlar® composite technology in association with Amber Composites and Technical Resin Bonders
The Lightning bodywork will incorporate aluminium honeycomb crushable impact cells. This composite monocoque structure uses the same technology that is used in Formula 1 motor racing to protect the driver. This material will be used in the front, rear and sides of the car s well as around the battery area
Regenerative braking
Upon braking, the car's kinetic energy is converted to heat through friction - throwing away the energy that was previously used to accelerate. In city driving, about 30 percent of a typical car's engine output is lost to braking.
When an electric vehicle is decelerating, it does not create friction and useless heat in order to slow down. Instead it reverses its electric motor turning it into an electric generator, creating electricity which is fed back into the battery and stored for future use. In fact any time an electric vehicle decelerates it causes the system to use the vehicle's momentum to generate electricity.
The Lightning Car Company today announced its development of a range of 700 bhp Lightning electric cars, for the first time genuinely harnessing electric motive power and uniting it with class-leading sports car design, engineering and production.
The remarkable car range has been conceived to satisfy three essential criteria, namely to deliver a highly stylised, graceful sports car with cues hinting at the quintessential British treatment of Aston Martin or TVR while delivering an explosive, dynamic performance based on new breakthrough electric technologies that make the ownership experience quicker, easier and cleaner than traditionally fuelled cars.
The Lightning Car Company draws upon 25 years of automotive experience from design and engineering personnel whose industry experience includes McLaren, Lola, Ronart and Vanwall, as well as championing the adoption and use of new generation electric battery and motor technologies derived from application in the aerospace industry. The business owners jointly share a clear vision of an electric-powered future for high performance motoring.
The Lightning began life as a traditionally powered petrol vehicle in order to develop the car's chassis dynamics. Battery and motor technology applications allow the handling characteristics of the car to be optimised. The chassis derives its inherent dynamic quality from its aluminium honeycomb and carbon composite monocoque structure, essentially a Formula One derived concept that blends low mass with high impact qualities.
Arthur Wolstenholme, Technical Director at Lightning explains, "Ten, or perhaps even five years ago, electric power was dismissed as a poor substitute for petrol, diesel or LPG. But the world has moved on significantly – from military and aerospace applications, electric motor and battery technologies have been developed that will enable the Lightning to demonstrate 700 plus bhp performance over a range that exceeds some of today's petrol performance cars. What's more, the Lightning is intended to compete with premium market sport cars, but our electric power should outstrip the response rates, torque characteristics and driveability of most exotic performance super cars. Electric power has truly arrived in the performance market."
The Lightning is set to dismiss all the preconceptions about electric power. It will be there immediately, and in abundance, providing amazing responsiveness. And, with a chassis designed to be more than capable dynamically, will make a great point to point proposition to rival the established guard.
The Lightning will combine high performance electric motive power with an advanced regenerative energy system that recharges the car's batteries under braking by capturing lost friction energy. This emerging technology utilised by Lightning in the road car sector will be adopted by Formula One from 2008 when KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems) become mandatory. The Lightning's use of this technology enables the range of the car to be extended to over 250 miles/400km.
With concourse elegance, blistering performance (expected to be a 0-60 time of sub 4 seconds) and a ten minute charge time to sustain a 250 mile range, the ownership costs of the Lightning range are set to be significantly lower than traditional fossil fuelled vehicles, with exemption from road tax, congestion charging and an urban cycle energy cost estimated at 2.2p per mile, the Lightning could be as much as £10,000 per year cheaper to run than a Audi RS4 based on an average 20,000 miles of motoring.
There are 3 Lightning models planned, a Grand Tourer, a competent and quick car which maintains a depth of luxury and specification; the Lightning Sport is the GT's lightweight, purposeful cousin, with the ability to achieve 0-60 in under 4 seconds. The third Lightning will be an extended range model, with the capability of reaching an estimated 250 miles on a single 10 minute charge.
The electric Lightning prototypes are now in development and pre-orders are being taken for 2008 delivery. Customised options for interior and exterior finishes and accessories will be available on a build to order basis.
THE ELECTRIC LIGHTNING - TOP 10 FEATURES
Ultra smooth 100% electric power (700+bhp) immediately from zero rpm
10 minute charge time for over 250 miles of motoring (GTSE model)
Uncompromising performance with 0-60mph in less than 4 seconds (GTS model)
State of the art NanoSafe™ battery system and Hi-Pa Drive™ electric motor technology
Full regenerative braking so the battery receives charge every time you slow down, travel downhill or simply coast
Commanding presence of carbon fibre/Kevlar hand-crafted bodywork
Clean technology means no congestion charge or road tax and the ultimate A grade green rating
Phenomenal economy up to 10 x cheaper to run than petrol
Safer with no large fuel tank, thermally stable batteries and a bodywork structure similar to that used in F1 to protect the driver
Luxury spec. interior – incorporating sat nav, ipod interface and virtual engine sound
MORE ABOUT ELECTRIC LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY
NanoSafe™ from Altairnano Inc.
Until now, battery technology has hindered electric vehicle innovation. In 2000, US company Altairnano Inc. established a research programme to create an ultra safe, high power battery using cutting-edge Nanotechnology. The result of their hard work is the NanoSafe™ battery.
SAFER - NanoSafe™ batteries use nano titanate materials instead of graphite which makes them far more thermally stable - there are no toxics or heavy metals used in NanoSafe™ batteries.
LONGER-LASTING - NanoSafe™ batteries have a life expectancy of 12+ years, versus the 3-5 year life of other batteries. NanoSafe™ can retain up to 85% charge capacity after 15,000 charges.
FASTER CHARGE - NanoSafe™ batteries can be recharged in approximately 10 minutes, rather than the hours required by many other rechargeable batteries.
MORE POWERFUL - With instantaneous power even at extreme temperatures, NanoSafe™ batteries deliver power per unit weight and unit volume several times that of conventional Lithium-Ion batteries.
Hi-Pa Drive™ from PML Flightlink Ltd
Hi-Pa Drive™ is a real revolution in motor technology and it's a British innovation to boot! With its integrated motor and drive electronics in one single unit it produces an ultra high power density - up to 20 times more than conventional systems.
The compact, energy-efficient, electric wheel motors produce unrivalled levels of torque with internal heavy-duty tapered roller bearings that can withstand heavy radial loads for robust use. Yet they achieve the power to weight ratio important for the performance sports car capability of the Lightning
Other features include total weather proofing, total energy transfer and several levels of redundancy, so any single failure will not prevent the vehicle from operating safely.
Carbon fibre/Kevlar® composite technology in association with Amber Composites and Technical Resin Bonders
The Lightning bodywork will incorporate aluminium honeycomb crushable impact cells. This composite monocoque structure uses the same technology that is used in Formula 1 motor racing to protect the driver. This material will be used in the front, rear and sides of the car s well as around the battery area
Regenerative braking
Upon braking, the car's kinetic energy is converted to heat through friction - throwing away the energy that was previously used to accelerate. In city driving, about 30 percent of a typical car's engine output is lost to braking.
When an electric vehicle is decelerating, it does not create friction and useless heat in order to slow down. Instead it reverses its electric motor turning it into an electric generator, creating electricity which is fed back into the battery and stored for future use. In fact any time an electric vehicle decelerates it causes the system to use the vehicle's momentum to generate electricity.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
samitch26 2:49AM (5/28/2008)
I have been talking with lithium iron phosphate battery producers in China. They are willing to sell similar packs for much cheaper and they are large format cells so much easier to work with. You can buy 800AH lithium iron phosphate cells and they are good for over 1000 charges. With economics of scale the prices on these batteries will drop rapidly.
Reply
Justin 7:46PM (8/26/2008)
If the cost of Nanosafe batteries comes down, the Lightning GT might be the future of the car. No need for fuel cells, no transmission, recharge in ten minutes. And as an electric car, like the Tesla, luxuriously quiet, torquey and green. Even economy cars in the future will be quiet and quick (flat torque curve). Cars will probably get cheaper to buy, without so many moving parts, and of course cheaper to run. The only downside will be less jobs for mechanics and workers at oil companies, but this will take awhile. The future's looking pretty good!
Reply
Kardax 7:05PM (6/12/2007)
And the price is...?
NanoSafe batteries are extremely expensive, and with the ZEV credit exploit only in California, this car can't possibly sell for less than $100,000...
Comparisons to the Tesla Roadster are inevitable, so I'll just point out the following:
- On launch day, Tesla already had an operational prototype and was giving 0-60-in-4-sec rides to the press and VIPs.
- On launch day, Tesla had already settled on a $100,000 price tag for their first 100 cars.
The specs are very much like the vaporware ZAP-X, but I'll give Lightning Car Co credit for having a much more complete plan.
Reply
Tony Belding 7:18PM (6/12/2007)
It looks to me like this company is an outgrowth from Ronart/Vanwall, it's a small "boutique" car maker with no interest or ability for mass production. So instead of comparing this car with the Tesla Roadster, probably a better comparison would be the Venturi Fetish.
Reply
Bill 8:34PM (6/12/2007)
Does anyone actually have a price for the NanoSafe battery pack - they offer 35kWh and 70 kWh versions.
Tesla uses over 6,800 common laptop cells.
Those cells are about $10 each retail, so even if they're half that wholesale the cost of the Tesla's battery pack represents at least a third of its retail price.
It'd be interesting to compate that to the NanoSafe, considering Phoenix is selling their NanoSafe-based small SUT for $45,000.
Reply
Pete 9:27AM (6/13/2007)
Does anyone know what the per car price is for each NanoSafe battery system?
Reply
Joseph 12:15AM (6/13/2007)
"Tesla uses over 6,800 common laptop cells.
Those cells are about $10 each retail"
Are you sure??? A $68,000 battery pack? The number I've heard has been pegged at around 20K.
Reply
RL 1:06AM (6/13/2007)
$10 for a Li-ion cell? You've got to be kidding. A high capacity AA cell is about $2 retail. Assuming Tesla's battery supplier specs a wider performance and environmental margin than your standard store bought AA battery and Tesla probably gets a significant volume discount, I would guess $2 per cell is reasonable. For 6,800 cells that works out to $13,600. Add another $5,000 for the ESS module itself and that puts you in the $20,000 ballpark. Come on people, use some common sense.
Reply
Sam Abuelsamid 9:03AM (6/13/2007)
Although Tesla won't say publicly how much the battery pack costs, the number that has been floating around is about $40,000 for the energy storage system that includes the pack, thermal management system and related electronics.
The Altairnano 35kW packs are estimated to run about $75,000 each right now.
Reply
Kardax 9:57AM (6/13/2007)
Don't forget that the Tesla pack is 56KWh, versus the NanoSafe 35KWh (62.5% of Tesla's). This makes Lightning's 250 mile range speculation highly doubtful.
Still, even if it's only 125 miles range in the end, this may still be acceptable for the UK, where things tend to be closer than the US.
Practically speaking, this car won't charge any faster than a Tesla (at least, not today) due to the total absence of a massively high-wattage charging infrastructure, so that range limit could be painful.
Also, with more research, I'm in agreement with Tony Belding that this is a very-low-volume "boutique" car manufacturer that's branching into electrics. This pushes the price up to perhaps $150,000 or more. This -also- puts them another notch above ZAP, as Lightning's alter egos have experience building complete cars.
Reply
AES 10:19AM (6/13/2007)
"This makes Lightning's 250 mile range speculation highly doubtful."
The ESS system on the Tesla adds a lot of extra weight-especially if you consider how the extra weight needed to house every cell adds up. Plus liquid cooling and electronics. Plus the safety equipment in case of a crash. The nanosafe pack doensn't require all that, and may actually be slightly lighter, affording more range than you'd think. I ran the math on the nanosafe cells, and it works out to around 770 pounds for 35kWh, versus 900 pounds for the Tesla.
Also, consider how the Phoenix truck gets 130 miles on this same pack. The Lightning is undoubtedly much much lighter, so it could probably go much farther than that.
Reply
Bill 1:16PM (6/13/2007)
Not a chance.
The older AA cells are about $4 each, so I can see $2 in quantity.
But those cells are literally half the capacity of the newest AA cells.
Unless you're arguing that Tesla went with the older cells (maybe that's the reason they need nearly 7,000 of them?)
>A high capacity AA cell is about $2 retail.
Reply
Kardax 5:58PM (6/13/2007)
AES: I agree that NanoSafe batteries are more elegant in principle than the Tesla ESS. That is not in dispute.
My argument is that if a 56KWh battery carries a Tesla Roadster 200 miles, mathematically a 35KWh battery would carry a similar car around 125.
It's true that Phoneix is claiming a 130 mile range on the NanoSafe 35KWh battery. But they have not done EPA city/highway testing, it's just a guess. Tesla _has_ done that testing, and therefore with Tesla's experience in this area, I'm more inclined to believe them than Phoenix.
Bill: Tesla has publicly stated that they're not using the latest and greatest lithium ion cells. Their stated reason is for durability concerns, but I speculate that cost is a factor, also.
Reply
Dave 10:05PM (6/13/2007)
Has anybody considered putting some sort of photovoltaic skin on the outside of these cars to recharge the batteries?
Reply
PKvex 10:36PM (6/13/2007)
At this point, I don't care which is better. I'm just glad they both exist.
Does it make me a pervert if I'm turned on by both these cars? More importantly, does anyone have $100,00 I can borrow?
Reply
Sebastian Blanco 11:24PM (6/13/2007)
Dave -
Don't know anything about the Lightning or the Tesla, but *somebody's* thinking about solar built into cars:
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/05/31/putting-a-solar-roof-on-your-prius-go-20-miles-on-battery-powe/
Reply
Robb Sands 5:06PM (6/15/2007)
I'll take three in assorted colours please :)
~Robb
http://inoot.co.uk
Reply
Jenny 10:08AM (6/14/2007)
Its nice to see Britain being at the forefront of electric car development what with this, the Writespeed, and Lotus who are involved in the Tesla and Zap X cars. Also nice that smaller companies are leading the way with this while the major manufactures lag behind.
Jenny
http://www.spaml.com
Reply
BunnySlope 5:29PM (6/18/2007)
"With styling that looks like a Jaguar from the front..."
Are you kidding me?
Is it just me or did they take the front end styling cues from "Cars". This could be "Lightning McQueen's" cousin!
Reply
Mal 10:42PM (6/22/2007)
OK, two things here have my snake oil detector beeping wildly here.
1. 10 Min recharge time? Anyone care to calculate the current required to do this? With normal domestic electricity supply?
2. This car is supposed to use regenerative braking, and be electrically driven, yet the photos show clarly large disk brakes & exhaust pipes!
Reply