Is the DOT working for the auto industry? Henry Waxman thinks so
If you spend any amount of time paying attention to the news recently, watching the American government sold bit by bit to large corporations, this story might not come as a shock to you. But it still bears mentioning. As someone wrote in the comments on the original, if there's wrongdoing and no one cares and no one gets punished, is it even wrongdoing?The story is as follows: Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), the head of the Committee on on Oversight and Government Reform, is curious about a call made by Heideh Shahmoradi, an aide at the Transportation Department, to a member of Congress. Since Shahmoradi left a voicemail instead of speaking directly to that Congressman, Waxman was able to get the transcript of the call, and he says it seems like this DOT aide was lobbying against California's tougher carbon emission standards by saying it would hurt (the exact phrase is "greatly impact") the car factories in the member's district. There's more, including the letter Waxman send to the DOT Secretary, over at TalkingPointsMemo, which is always good for this sort of reporting.
Of course, we don't know all the details here, and any assumption of actual illegal acts is premature. But can't we start coming down on the side of "likely" once in a while?
[Source: TPM]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
RL 12:41AM (6/15/2007)
Why am I not surprised by this? More of the same from this corrupt fascist Administration.
Reply
Chris 12:55AM (6/15/2007)
The DOT is under the President, and his position is to help industry and stick it to the environment - he's a Republican, that's what they do. Thank God some of the underling positions aren't appointed.
Reply
motorman 11:25AM (6/15/2007)
when the recreational industry in this country collapses who is going to hire all they people who will be out of work? remember no more truck campers,camping trailers,motorhomes,campgrounds,service for these items and even GPS makers.
Reply
susan.kraemer 2:14PM (6/15/2007)
We are going to have to be ready to replace every bureacrat that works on the pro-extinction side of the aisle come January 2009.
I can't believe how now the head of the EPA, Johnson, having lost the supreme court battle over CO2 (yes it IS a pollutant that should be regulated under the old Clean Air Act), now is delaying allowing the California waiver on the grounds that they need to figure out what "endangerment" means.
http://warminglaw.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/06/epa_wordplay_wh.html
Reply