Gordon Murray launches new car company
The man behind the legendary McLaren F1 and some of the most innovative Formula 1 cars of the seventies and eighties has launched a new car company. Gordon Murray is working on a new small car so efficient that the savings will allow an owner to save it's full $10,000 cost within four years. Not only will the operating costs be pared to the bone, the energy and emissions needed to manufacture it will also be minimized. Murray is not planning to mass produce the new car but will instead license the design to interested companies. Murray's focus will be on a new radically more efficient vehicle architecture with running prototypes ready within two years. The first iteration is expected to run on a small gas engine, but the architecture could support any type of powertrain. The car will weigh approximately 1100 lbs and will undoubtedly be novel. Hopefully it will also come to fruition before long. Such a lightweight and presumably inexpensive chassis to offset the weight and cost of a battery pack could make for a truly useful EV.
[Source: CAR]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Joseph 7:06PM (7/05/2007)
"Murray is working on a new small car so efficient that the savings will allow an owner to save it's full $10,000 cost within four years."
Well, at $3.50 a gallon (for America assuming that is the avrage price for the next couple years) divided by 20mpg at 15,000 miles a year for four years comes up to about 10k. Unless the car doesn't cost anything to run, or gas prices go through the roof, I don't think the car will save you 10k.
Although I doubt he'll actually meet his claim, I wish him luck.
Reply
Shibby 6:32AM (7/06/2007)
Could this be Project Kimber, AKA the smart Roadster?
Reply
Azrael4h 6:26PM (7/06/2007)
With that average, wouldn't that mean that the car, at a scant 1100 lbs should be getting 50mpg at least with a standard gasoline engine and even a slushbox. CVT or better yet AMT would be better for mileage (though I'm not so sure of the CVT's reliability). With a 3 cylinder TDI, it should see 60-70mpg in such a light car, assuming decent gearing and aerodynamics. If a boxy '80's compact truck (Isuzu) can average 45mpg, then it better.
So, using the same estimates as above, 60mpg with 3.50/gal average, 15,000 miles a year, that would come to a fuel cost of $875 for a year. $3,500 for 4 years, so if the 15000mi/20mpg*$3.50g*4yr is correct, then you'd save exactly $7,000 over that period, or $1,750/yr.
Of course, the mpg is a flat constant in the equation, when it in reality a variable, as is the miles driven and fuel price. But, at 6 years, the car would "pay for itself" assuming the target goals are met and the variables remained at the average levels in the equations.
In order to meet the stated goal of $10k savings in 4 years, the car would have to average about 250mpg or more ($840 fuel cost for a 4 year period, according to the constants). So I don't see that happening. 60-70mpg, yes, but 250+? We won't see that kind of efficiency out of any car, ever. We'll be driving pure electric or pure hydrogen-bomb cars at that point, or a mixture. Or we'll all die. Who cares.
Reply
the dude 9:24AM (7/12/2007)
the cost is much more then just fuel... tyres, servicing inner city charges, at a guess.
it will happen and it will be phat.
Reply