USA and Europe ethanol producers peeved with OECD's report on bad biofuels
A few months ago, a report with the OECD seal showed some concerns about biofuels. Media published the report and, like a snowball, the thing ended up being "the OECD document that condemns biofuels". Now, the Renewable Fuels Association and European Bioethanol Fuel Association (eBIO) have sent an open letter to the General Secretary of the OECD, Ángel Gurria, and they're quite angry.First of all they say that the document, even with a disclaimer that says that it may not be supported by the OECD or any of its state members, has the Organisation's seal and should be backed up or dismissed by them. The report, which cannot be found on the OECD's site but can be found at the websites of "antiethanol third parties" (their words), expressed serious concerns about ethanol made from grains.
The two associations state that in previous documents, the OECD has given full support to biofuels as a means of reducing CO2 emissions but the document is written from a partisan position that such an organisation should not be liable for.
They end the letter by countering some of the affirmations of that report by saying, for instance, that biofuels don't interfere with food supply or grain prices, that cellullosic ethanol is a reality or that biofuels are a reasonable solution to rising oil prices.
[Source: Abengoa via Energías Renovables]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
No name 4:55PM (9/19/2008)
Yes, it can be found on the OECD's website. The report was prepared for an OECD roundtable on biofuels.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/46/39348696.pdf
Reply
M Powers 12:02PM (10/03/2007)
the ethanol lobby had best get used to this sort of negative attention... why? because sugar/corn-based ethanol is a LOSER relative to other biofuels.
most of have no problem with ethanol per se - if folks want to wager their lives/$$$ on corn-based ethanol, that's their decision. most of us do have a problem with the huge, unjustified subsidies being reaped by agribiz and farmers to sell and promote one of the worst biofuel options in the country - ethanol.
wake up america - corn-based ethanol is a scam.
Reply
dhofmann 1:41PM (10/03/2007)
"...sugar/corn-based ethanol is a LOSER relative to other biofuels."
What's wrong with sugar[cane]-based ethanol?
Reply
Upali Wickramasinghe 8:03PM (12/05/2007)
There is a very simple solution, which is well known to the Asians. I am surprised that the obvious had been missed by those in the OECD.
Reply
Upali Wickramasinghe 12:53PM (12/10/2007)
The solution starts with agriculture and end with distillation. The ecological, environmental,net energy and costs can be brought within acceptable limits.
Reply