CO2 offset milestone: 100,000 TerraPasses sold
If I can't buy a hybrid or get an EV for 'round town needs, then perhaps a carbon offset sticker is the right move. That's what at least 100,000 people have decided, according to the leading consumer/driver carbon offset vendor, TerraPass. Earlier this month, TerraPass sold its 100,000th TerraPass to one Heraldo Botelho of Palo Alto, CA. It was Botelho's first TerraPass and it offset a flight he took to visit his family. Like so many other TerraPassers, he said he wanted to do something for the environment, and carbon offset was his solution.
[Source: TerraBlog]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
kt 8:08PM (1/29/2008)
The cake is a lie.
Reply
Steve 11:34AM (1/30/2008)
*sigh* You can't offset co2 emissions just by planting trees (I wish you could). Why not? Because more trees are being cut down at any given second than are being planted. And even if that weren't the case, I doubt there's enough land in the entire world to offset all of the world's current co2 emissions, to say nothing of future increases.
Quit wasting money on this crap and buy stock in alternative energy companies instead. There are some good ones out there, and I doubt the stocks are all that expensive, so you probably don't even have to spend as much.
Carbon offsets are just a way for hypocrites to keep living in massive houses, flying around the world and driving big cars while claiming to be 'green.'
Reply
Throwback 11:48AM (1/30/2008)
What a farce. It's okay to pollute, as long as you can pay for the privilege.
Reply
Throwback 11:50AM (1/30/2008)
Good points Steve, but will you get that nice sticker to show how environmentally conscious you are?
Reply
Paul 12:17PM (1/30/2008)
Steve and Throwback-
You may want to check your facts -- Terrapass does not plant trees -- they invest the funds in alternative energy sources and methane capture among other things:
http://www.terrapass.com/projects/
BTW, some people (like me) MUST fly for work and we MUST drive some kind of car so why not make a donation (let's call it what it is) to fund projects that are otherwise largely being ignored by the federal government that is reluctant to do the most effective thing and charge a carbon tax on all consumer products.
My entire company (2500 employees) offsets the carbon it produces -- that is millions a year going toward real projects that will reduce future carbon emissions, such as wind farms. Explain to me how that is a bad thing?
Reply
Throwback 12:52PM (1/30/2008)
How does investing in alternative energy sources "take out" CO2 that is already in the air? I have no problem with people donating money to whomever and whatever they want, it's your money. However, to imply that buy "donating" to a particular company you are in effect "cleaning" the air is wrong. Companies like this give the impression you can help the environment if you just pay for your pollution. I think we should do our best going forward to minimize our impact, but as you point out, you need to travel for work which allows you to provide for you and your family. I need to drive to work everyday to provide for my family. My desire to reduce our oil consumption is focused on our national security first and foremost. That does not mean I don't care about the environment, it just means my priorities start with our national security. For example, if the choice is ethanol or oil, I'll take ethanol even it is not a very green fuel because we will not be as dependent on countries that want to kill us, for our energy.
Reply
zoominsf 3:58PM (1/30/2008)
Throwback, your last sentence doesn't really make sense: how can countries we're dependent on kill us for "our" energy? If we're dependent on them, then it obviously isn't our energy to begin with. A lot of people want to kill us, but not for "our" energy -- they don't need ours, they have plenty of their own.
Also, nobody said anything about taking CO2 out of the air, that's not how it works. When you buy an offset, the intent is to do just that: OFFSET the amount of CO2 you produce with an equal REDUCTION in CO2, through some sort of clean(er) energy production. It's not perfect, but the idea is that until we're able to reduce CO2 production significantly, we can at least try to ensure we're funding projects that balance that CO2 output with zero or low CO2 emissions.
Reply
Slickdeal 4:27PM (1/30/2008)
Throwback- Carbon offsets do not "take out CO2 that is already in the air." Rather, carbon offsets purchase a given amount of energy from carbon neutral energy sources (windfarms/methane collection) and theoretically reduce the demand on carbon-intensive energy sources, including coal and oil power plants.
This transfer of energy from carbon-intensive to carbon-netural sources reduce or "offset" the C02 emitted by a C02 generating activity, whether driving or flying.
Carbon offsets are just another step you can take at reducing your carbon footprint. You could take public transportation, recycle, and conserve, but there are some activities in modern life, such as riding an airplane or driving to work, that are not the best for the environment, but necessary.
Regarding your support for ethanol, remember that ethanol production is not at all petroleum free. A large amount of petroleum-based products are used to support agriculture, including pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizers.
Reply
Bill 3:05PM (1/31/2008)
I think this is a great business idea.
I'll be slapping together a website offering "offsets" to you guilt-laden posters.
Reply