Brock Yates now writes for TTAC, this time rants on traffic
Love him or hate him, Brock Yates always has something to say. When he was fired from Car and Driver (seemingly because they could no longer afford his services), there were both tears of joy and of misery. As far as we're concerned, reading Brock's opinions has little bearing on our own, so we don't mind him at all. Interestingly, Brock chose to cover the issue of traffic for his first posting over at The Truth About Cars. What are the solutions to traffic woes, according to Brock Yates? None (yet). Deal with it. He calls mass transit a pipe dream and shrugs off the bicycle. Walking? Not mentioned specifically, but we guess the answer would be negative. So, we are stuck with the car and all of the emissions that goes along with it. Although his post is ostensibly about congestion, he does note the fact that the traffic causes other problems related to oil usage and pollution.
Brock touches on potential solutions to oil usage and emissions when he says, "the same basic old world engineering sits under the slick bodywork. It's like the weather; everyone complains, but no one does anything about it." The solutions are simple in concept, but quite difficult in practice. Will the Tesla ignite the electric car market? Will the Volt usher in an era of extended-range electrics? Will the Smart start a micro-car war with corresponding micro-emissions? Maybe the answer is that ever higher gas prices will mean that the answer to all three of the above questions is affirmative.
[Source: Brock Yates / TTAC]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
sila332 4:31PM (2/02/2008)
I'm glad I ran across this editorial. I can't agree more with what Yates wrote, our dependence on cars creates a problem almost as massive as the benefits we derive from their use. Its hard to convince people that its not just stupidity that is driving this problem, most people have a fair idea about the costs and benefits involved and act (fairly) rationally.
Here's where Autoblog readers might stop reading. I think there is good reason to believe the solution is closer than most people think. We are close to refining a tool (the computer) that can remove the design flaw that has been with cars since they were first built (the driver). I do not claim to know exactly how this transformation will take place but I believe it is the most likely solution to a problem that has to be solved.
Up till now I've not seen a good description of the true implications of the automation of cars. The idea that it means you could drink a latte and work on your laptop misses the point entirely. It will rework the structure of society as deeply as did the train, the container box, and the car.
Reply
dhofmann 5:02PM (2/02/2008)
Venice and London have solved traffic congestion.
Reply
hwyhobo 5:56PM (2/02/2008)
> London have solved traffic congestion
ROFLMAO. I want what you're smoking.
Reply
dhofmann 6:25PM (2/02/2008)
For some reason, I thought London's congestion charge was actually reducing congestion. Guess not.
Reply
mike 11:30AM (2/03/2008)
Solve Congestion? Free Public Transit in and out of City's, paid for with a Gas Tax. Then the horsepower wacko's, like this guy, can drive their cars more enjoyably.
Highway congestion problem? Build and ship by RAIL.
Make trucking LOCAL ONLY.
There are easy solutions to these problems, but, there's a Corporate media, Corporate Congress and Corporate Court paid for by the Corporate Elite, the K-Street lobbyist's. This Country isn't run by Logic, Reason or Democracy, it's run by MONEY.
Reply
Ernie 5:26PM (2/04/2008)
Mike said:
"This Country isn't run by Logic, Reason or Democracy, it's run by MONEY."
That's right. That's why they say money makes the world go round. Every country that ever existed since the dawn of civilization has been run by money. It's why any attempt to make the world a better place must run at a profit. It's the only way that actually works.
Reply
stevefazek 7:22PM (2/06/2008)
you cant get mad at him people with serious late stage Alzheimer's like him say dumb things all the time
Reply