GM and National Governors Association team on E85 infrastructure
The National Governors Association is teaming up with General Motors to promote the expansion of E85 distribution around the country. While no one seriously expects the corn-based ethanol that we have today to be anything more than a very small piece of the fuel puzzle, GM is firmly committed to next-generation biofuels. Since the start of this year, GM has made equity investments in two different companies (Coskata and Maskoma) developing processes to produce low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty announced the agreement at the NGA meeting in Philadelphia. Pawlenty has been a major proponent of biofuels in his own state, having recently proposed making all gasoline sold be a 20-percent ethanol blend. Under the agreement, GM will work with state governments to determine where best to locate E85 pumps to make them most accessible to drivers of flex-fuel vehicles. Currently there are just under 1,700 E85 pumps available nationwide out of the total of 170,000 filling stations. The intent of this partnership is to ensure that over the next few years as cellulosic ethanol gets commercialized, there will be easily-accessible locations where drivers of the millions of flex-fuel vehicles on the road can get biofuel. The GM press release is included after the jump.
[Source: General Motors]
GM, National Governors Association Team Up On E85
Goal is Building Infrastructure for Next-Generation Biofuels
PHILADELPHIA – The National Governors Association and General Motors Corp. will work together to expand the nationwide infrastructure and distribution network for E85 ethanol aimed at being ready when next-generation ethanol made from a variety of non-grain sources is available.
The announcement was made Sunday by Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty during the opening plenary session of the NGA Centennial Meeting in Philadelphia. The partnership was formed under the Securing a Clean Energy Future Initiative Pawlenty championed as chair of the NGA.
"As we face this current energy crisis, we must do more to Americanize our energy sources and reduce our dependence on foreign oil," Gov. Pawlenty said. "An important part of that effort is promoting the use of homegrown alternatives. This collaboration with GM will help increase the availability of E85 around the country, providing more consumer choice and moving us toward a more secure energy future."
Under the plan, GM will use expertise gained in helping bring 300 E85 pumps on line in 15 states over the last three years, to assist more states in strategically locating pumps to allow owners of flex-fuel vehicles to choose between ordinary gasoline and E85, which consists of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline.
"The infrastructure development for E85 needs to expand now if the nation is to be ready for the significant growth in ethanol coming from new sources," said Beth Lowery, GM vice president of Environment, Energy and Safety Policy. "We need a range of alternatives to offset growing energy demand in this country and globally."
In addition to helping connect fuel retailers with available grants for pump installations and conversions, GM assists in determining the best locations for pumps based on flex-fuel vehicle registrations. It will expand these efforts to as many as eight states under the NGA partnership.
GM is steadily increasing the number of cars and trucks offered with flex-fuel capability at no extra cost to consumers. For 2009, GM will have 18 FlexFuel models including the four-cylinder Chevrolet HHR. GM has committed to making 50 percent of production flex-fuel capable by 2012, providing the infrastructure is progressing.
There are currently fewer than 1,700 E85 pumps in the nation out of about 170,000 gasoline stations. Many flex-fuel vehicle owners have never used E85 because they have no easy access to it.
The third part of GM's E85 commitment is strategic alliances and equity investments in two next-generation ethanol start-ups – Coskata Inc. and Mascoma Corp. The two companies cover the spectrum of biothermal and biochemical conversion of non-grain based sources into ethanol.
"GM continues to believe ethanol is the most significant near-term energy alternative to offset the increasing demand for oil," Lowery said. "To make ethanol a viable alternative to gasoline requires sustainable production methods, a variety of vehicle offerings and a robust infrastructure to make the fuel available to consumers."
General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM), the world's largest automaker, has been the annual global industry sales leader for 77 years. Founded in 1908, GM today employs about 266,000 people around the world. With global headquarters in Detroit, GM manufactures its cars and trucks in 35 countries. In 2007, nearly 9.37 million GM cars and trucks were sold globally under the following brands: Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, GM Daewoo, Holden, HUMMER, Opel, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Vauxhall and Wuling. GM's OnStar subsidiary is the industry leader in vehicle safety, security and information services. More information on GM can be found at www.gm.com.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Matthx 7:10PM (7/14/2008)
Unless ethanol is produced by waste, this ethanol thing is like setting up our coffin. Where is the logic behind growing food (corn and sugar canes) to transform them to propulse our cars when there is still some human beings that cant eat more than 1 meal per day... I mean c'mon lets not fall into that...
Reply
DaveD 9:57PM (7/14/2008)
Thank you Matthx.
Come on folks, even if you're too callous to care that people are starving because we use corn for ethanol, or that food prices are going up, then consider this: It's a total waste of energy, water, fertilizer, etc, etc.
The only, ONLY people who benefit from this are some corn farmers and their politicians.
And YES, my family is one those families who get more for their corn because we have a large farm. But we don't need it, we can make money on other crops or selling our existing corn for food. I'm not so greedy that I'd support this wasteful program.
Geez folks, the common person putting it in his car gets worse gas mileage. Folks, it has a LOWER ENERGY CONTENT.
The only redeeming quality it has it that we don't use quite as much oil from the middle east. And even that is questionable with the lower energy content. Did you really save anything when you have to put more total gas in your tank to go the same distance???
Reply
Brent 10:49AM (7/15/2008)
Yawn. We all know that. Cellulosic is the next big thing for these guys, of course they are going to work on their infrastructure. I am a big supporter of algae oil though. :)
Jimmy 12:52AM (7/15/2008)
DaveD, it takes very little petroleum to produce corn ethanol, most all of the fossil inputs are from natural gas or coal produced electricity. A tank of E85 means far less petroleum use than a tank of gasoline. Ethanol has fewer BTU per gallon, but that is beside the point as all logical discussions look at energy in standard units.
DaveD 10:08PM (7/14/2008)
You're right Brent, we all know this.....Yet nobody is doing anything to organize and stop it. Your tax dollars, and mine, are going to pay people to grow corn for ethanol and subsidize it today.
What does it take for someone to stop this nonsense?
FYI...I LOVE the algae for oil stuff too! :-)
Reply
Boxman 1:44AM (7/17/2008)
Don't forget switchgrass. It grows wild and in great abundance in the midwest and requires no fertilizer, irrigation, etc. Research is well underway to engineer bacteria which will break down the switchgrass into ethanol and virtually zero cost.
There are many possibilities with ethanol; just because the current methods for producing (from corn) are inefficient and wasteful doesn't mean we should give up on ethanol altogether.
That would be a mistake because we NEED ethanol as a viable alternative to gasoline.
Reply
daniel 10:39AM (7/17/2008)
This is the dumbest technology I've seen in a while. Ethanol can be made from ANY organic matter, ANY food waste. Why don't we just collect what we already have as a raw material for this fuel? Food waste should be collected along with other recyclables, even if a small percentage of our population participates, the early adopters, the dent in the amount of actively grown vegetation for this project will be huge. Start with cities like NYC (where I live) where many people live in close proximity in order to reduce the amount of trucks/distance needed to start this infrastructure. Will it be a pain initially? of course, will it lower food prices, fuel prices, reduce the amount of trash going to landfills, cause us to waste less... yes.
If the gov't insists on having farmers grow crops for this purpose in addition to using waste materials, why use food? grow GMO grasses, weeds, anything that has a cell wall and grows like crazy with minimal care, not corn
Reply