Austin Alt Car: TriTrack concept wins the outlandish-as-all-get-out prize

click to enlarge
"I'm the greenest guy here."
That's the claim of Jerry Roane, of Roane Inventions Incorporated, who did note that the pure solar vehicles in the corner were potential competitors. "Here" is the first ever Austin Alt Car Expo, which started today in Austin Texas. We can debate whether Roane is right or not after the show, and we'll be bringing you full coverage over the next few days, but for now we'll start with a look at Roane's TriTrack vehicle idea. It's green, but it's also pretty much the craziest thing we've seen in a long, long while (note: like Chris Paine, we have a soft spot for the crazies).
The aerodynamic TriTrack vehicle, made from a aluminum honeycomb composite, seats four and is very lightweight. How light? Try 300 pounds. This incredible lightness means that lead acid batteries are actually preferred when the vehicle is off the guideway to give it some heft.
Guideway? That word certainly didn't mean much to me when Roane first used it, but we've got the full details after the jump.
Gallery: Austin Alt Car: TriTrack
[Source: Tritrack]
TriTrack is the name of the vehicle and the track. For good reason, they system only works if both are present. The Guideways are the a system of elevated train tracks with the central TriTrack, shaped like a Toblerone bar without the breakable sections, running along the length of the guideway. The track is also covered in solar panels to power the li-ion batteries used when the vehicles are on the Guideways. Each TriTrack vehicle (Roane said he has a better name in his mind but doesn't have enough money to trademark it) operates as a pretty standard EV when it's driving around town on those lead acids, but it's the Guideways that make it work more efficiently. Yes, for now, this stuff is purely conceptual.
Built in short (1-2 miles) and long (from the center of town to the outskirts) lengths, the Guideways are sections where the vehicles are computer-controlled and can reach speeds of 180 mph. There are 40 mph on and off ramps where - get this - the EV's heavy batteries are unloaded when you get on and then a new set of fresh juice boxes (actually a battery mule with a 10 hp motor) is inserted in the car when you get off. The cars are moved by linear motors when on the ramps.
Currently, Roane thinks he has it figured out how the TriTrack system could work in Austin, and would like to start with a network that serves the University of Texas here. This could operate using a car-sharing model before spreading out to other parts of town with private ownership and a more widespread series of Guideways. Roane said his estimate is that a Guideways network will cost about $170,000 per mile to build for a total cost of $5 $500 million to set up the greater Austin area.
If built, a TriTrack vehicle would cost the customer about $10,000 and have an operating cost of about 25 cents a mile, including insurance and everything. The cost of the energy to move the cars is about 4.5 cents a mile. You don't buy the battery mules, since these are switched so often (multiple times a day in most cases). When running on the lead-acid battery mules, a TriTrack vehicle could go around 200 miles, but Roane is adamant that the user really won't ever have to think about energy issues when driving one of these things. There's no fuel gauge in the car, for example, and you get that new 200-mile range each time you come off the Guideway.
The TriTrack model is an official Auto X Prize contender, so it's a good bet we'll be hearing more about this in the coming months. For now, let's hear your thoughts.
Oh, one more thing. They can park on their tails.
UPDATE: The price to build a TriTrack system in Austin has been corrected, thanks to an email from Roane. He continues:
The other correction is the solar panels would be 7 feet wide and be under the guideway not on the guideway. The PV we are considering are the 40.8% efficient NREL devices and the devices need concentrated sunlight so the PV component would be under the triangular guideway protected from hail damage and the sun would be reflected up to the panels. To be redundant the reflectors would be at 17 feet elevation the 40.8% efficient very expensive solar devices would be at 20 feet elevation and the top of the triangular guideway would be at about 21 feet elevation over the city for the lower of the two guideway elevations. I try to use flowery language at these events so people will remember the sound bites so I usually say "in the shadow of the cars" as they pass by. This describes the 7 foot-wide solar mirrors and where they are on the poles. The green claim is because solving the pollution of the 4-passenger car would be addressing a large component of health damaging pollution. The diesel and natural gas solutions still produce large amounts of NOx which downstream with sunlight and VOC produce ground level ozone and this ground level ozone to me is more important that the CO2 argument because it directly impacts the health and well being of our youngest and weakest among us with increased incidence of asthma and respiratory ailments.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Dean 11:59PM (10/17/2008)
I like the concept. It's a blend of Aptera (lightweight, highly aerodynamic EV), Better Place (utility company-driven battery swapping) and light rail (light rail). But the implementation would need to fleshed out some more before I would vote for it.
(1) How do you drive 180 mph on a non-branching rail system when the exit is 40 mph? The entry/exit would be a bottleneck. (2) How do you drive in Austin without A/C or windows that open? At night, I guess. (3) When your vehicle is shaped like a wiener, why would you need 3 other seats? For your imaginary friends. (4) Are all female passengers required to wear tube tops?
Seriously, I wish it could solve all it says it could. But for now, all I can say is, "Far out, Mr. Roane. Far out!"
Reply
Chris M 2:09AM (10/18/2008)
This is just one of many different proposed "dual mode" vehicle designs, made to run both on special automated powered guideways, and on regular roads. A good overview of various proposals is here:
http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/dualmode.htm
Roane borrowed the triangular guideway idea from the RUF (Rapid Urban Flexible) transit design of Palle Jensen, though the vehicles are quite different.
Aside from the odd look, TriTrac has some serious design flaws. Those outrigger front wheels stick out even more than on an Aptera. The complete inability to switch tracks means having to lay out a separate pair of tracks to connect each and every destination. The minimum radius for guideway curves is extremely large, which could cause problems in routing guideways in crowded urban areas.
The most serious flaw is that the battery pack, motor and rear wheel fit into the same slot used by the guideway, thus the vehicle must drop off the battery/motor/rear wheel to get on the guideway, and must pick up another battery/motor/rear wheel at the other end before going back on the roads. If there is a lot of Tritrac drivers going to the same destination, they are liable to run out of those battery assemblies, leaving a line of vehicles stranded on the guideway until a big truck hauls a load of battery/motor/wheel packs to where they are needed. They could keep thousands of battery/motor/wheel packs at each location, but that would bankrupt the system with inventory costs.
Reply
!!D 11:43AM (10/20/2008)
Chris, thanks for the link to the study; that's good info.
However, I disagree with what you call design flaws. The distance between the left and right wheels (usually known as the "track", a term which can be confused with the guideway in this conversation) may be any width so long as it fits within one lane of traffic. That's a design parameter, not a flaw. Having no track branches or switches is a design feature, not a flaw. It simplifies the design and construction of the guideway and reduces wear-and-tear and cost. A driver changes his route by exiting one track and choosing the next track in a paved transition area or intersection. TriTrack guideways aren't meant to turn within urban areas. If you see the designs Mr. Roane has made for Austin and San Antonio, the guideways are all mostly straight sections aligned with the street grid; a driver exits the TriTrack guideway to make a 90-degree turn. Finally, the supply-vs-demand of vehicle power supplies can be planned for because the transit operator knows the number of subscribers and their daily commute and other driving habits. Having enough battery packs at each terminal is indeed a serious design issue that must be addressed, but it is not a flaw (since it can be overcome).
chuck 9:05PM (5/10/2009)
Pie in the sky
Reply
jerry.roane 6:28PM (8/21/2009)
Everybody likes pie. What is wrong with having a solution? Is there a preference for no solution to air pollution, energy dependence and traffic congestion? What part of a car that rolls on a beam is hard for you? I have learned that it is taught in writing school to put in some stupid comment up front to add "interest" to your article. I personally think it is detrimental to communication and tabloid-like. What America needs is straight talk. We need a solution to oil dependence beyond crap like cash for clunkers at a 4 mpg upsell. Imagine 300 mpg equivalent at speed or 1200 passenger mpg. Sky enough for you?