2010 Chevrolet Equinox; direct injected with 30 mpg!

If General Motors is still with us for the 2010 model year, the Chevrolet Equinox will be getting a thorough makeover particularly in the engine compartment. The new Equinox gets an all-new look in keeping with other recent Chevrolets including the obligatory dual-port grille. Dimensionally, the Equinox keeps the same 112.5 inch wheelbase and body measurements are all within an inch of the current model. On the inside, the dash gets a dual cockpit look similar to the Malibu and Traverse as well as all the usual electronic bits now found in new cars such as BlueTooth, USB audio input and rear view camera.
The best stuff, though, is underhood where a new direct injected version of the 2.4L EcoTec four replaces the ancient 3.4L V6. Mileage with the four cylinder/6-speed automatic combo goes from 17/24 mpg to an estimated 21/30 mpg. A new 3.0L direct injected V6 replaces the port injected 3.6L formerly offered in the Sport. The V6 improves mileage from 17/24 mpg to 18/25 mpg.
When we previewed the new Equinox at GM's Tech Center this week, no officials would officially comment on the hybrid question, other than to say additional hybrids are coming and the two-mode system in the Saturn Vue would fit in this vehicle. Odds are we will see either a next generation mild hybrid or two-mode hybrid in the Equinox sooner rather than later.
Gallery: 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
[Source: Chevrolet]
PRESS RELEASE:
2010 CHEVROLET EQUINOX:
A COMPACT CROSSOVER FOR ALL SEASONS – AND ALL LIFESTYLES
All-new crossover delivers expected segment-best highway fuel economy
DETROIT – Chevrolet unveiled the all-new 2010 Equinox, a compact crossover that blends distinctive design with outstanding efficiency. A new, 2.4L direct injection engine helps the Equinox deliver expected best-in-segment estimated highway fuel economy of 30 mpg (EPA certification pending) – a 25-percent improvement over the previous model. Chevrolet expects nearly two-thirds of customers will choose the efficient, 2.4L engine.
The new Equinox draws its exterior design inspiration from the Chevrolet Malibu sedan and Traverse crossover; and like those vehicles, the new Equinox complements its styling with attention to detail and unexpected features, according to Ed Peper, GM North America vice president, Chevrolet.
The Equinox makes its world debut at the North American Auto Show in Detroit next month.
"At a time when customers are so concerned about the fuel efficiency of their vehicle, the Equinox delivers," said Peper. "It offers the roominess and capability of a crossover with great fuel economy. Equinox will provide customers a vehicle filled with refinement, comfort and great value."
The 2010 Equinox goes on sale in mid-2009. It is available in LS, LT and LTZ trim, with available all-wheel-drive. Two new engines are offered, each with fuel-saving direct injection and variable valve timing technology. Vehicle highlights include:
- New 2.4L Ecotec direct injected I-4 engine estimated at 182 horsepower (135 kW), which delivers an estimated 30 mpg highway, 21 mpg city (EPA certification pending)
- New 3.0L DOHC direct injected V-6 engine estimated at 255 horsepower (190 kW), which delivers an estimated 25 mpg highway, 18 mpg city (EPA certification pending)
- Driving range of more than 500 miles (800 km) with both engines, for less-frequent fill-ups
- Six standard air bags: dual frontal air bags; head curtain side air bags and pelvic/thorax seat-mounted side air bags
- Standard four-wheel disc brakes with StabiliTrak electronic stability control and traction control
- Standard OnStar and XM Satellite Radio
- "Smart" remote starting system that also activates the HVAC system and optional heated seats depending on the outside temperature
"With the 2010 Equinox, we focused on appealing to the senses – from the overall design to the feel of the interior," said Peper.
Design details
The design features Chevy's signature global face – the two-tier grille and prominent gold Bowtie insignia. Strong fender shapes, a distinctive premium roofline, wraparound headlamps and dual round taillamps are additional elements that define Equinox as a true Chevrolet, Peper said.
"The new Equinox blends function and style into a very sporty, yet upscale compact crossover," said Ed Welburn, vice president of GM Global Design. "Both the exterior and interior surprise and delight with careful attention to detail."
Additional design features include:
- A multi-dimensional hood and wraparound rear side glass and a wheels-at-the-corners stance
- Improved aerodynamic performance through a number of carefully designed exterior features, including moving the base of the windshield forward approximately three inches (75 mm) for a sleeker profile
Equinox's rocker panels are integrated into the doors to make it easier to get in and out of the vehicle. They narrow the area over which a passenger must step, offering protection for pant legs that could brush against dirty rockers. Also, the select use of chrome trim and flush-fitting "exposed-edge" windshield and rear glass reinforce Equinox's build quality and reduce wind noise.
Dimensionally, the Equinox rides on the same 112.5-inch wheelbase (2,857 mm), but is about one inch (25 mm) shorter in length and an inch wider. It also has a wider front track that enhances the ride and handling.
Interior amenities, storage and flexibility
Inside, the Equinox features attention to detail – including a number of storage bins, such as an oversized glove box; a closed storage bin in the instrument panel above the center stack; and closed storage under the center armrest large enough for a laptop computer.
A "floating" center stack houses a multitude of ergonomic comfort and convenience controls. Contemporary, ice-blue ambient lighting – featured within and surrounding the center stack, encircling the center-console cupholders and within the door pull cups – accentuates the cabin. The front and rear seats, which include cloth and uplevel, perforated leather-trimmed offerings, were developed to help deliver best-in-class comfort.
The new Equinox retains its MultiFlex rear seat capability, which allows the seat to be moved fore or aft nearly eight inches (203 mm), for the best rear legroom in its class. With the 60/40-split-back rear seat moved all the way forward, the cargo area offers 31.4 cubic feet (889 liters) of storage.
The Equinox's cabin is notable for its quietness. Noise-absorbing elements are built into the chassis, engine compartment and interior.
Convenience, infotainment and connectivity
A variety of technologies are integrated in the Equinox, such as an available seven-inch touch-screen navigation system. Additional features also include:
- Bluetooth hands-free phone connectivity
- USB audio connectivity
- DVD-based rear-seat entertainment system with two independent screens to enable DVD viewing on one and gaming on the other
- Internal memory/hard drive on uplevel radios for storing audio selections
- Power, programmable rear liftgate
- Rear-vision camera system, with display in the rearview mirror or in the navigation screen
- Range of premium-feature audio systems with up to eight speakers and 250 watts of output
Chassis and suspension
The 2010 Equinox is built on a body-integral structure with single-piece body side stampings and targeted applications of high-strength steel. Those elements form the foundation of a solid, quiet driving experience, according to Peper. The strong structure enabled engineers to tune the four-wheel-independent suspension system for greater control and driver feedback.
Standard and available features include:
- Available all wheel drive
- Family of 17-, 18- and 19-inch alloy wheels
- Fuel-saving electric power steering system
The rack-mounted electric power steering system provides greater fuel efficiency of on 2.4L-equipped models that saves nearly 11 miles per tank of gas, or about 572 miles per year (assuming one fill-up per week). With the Equinox's estimated 30 mpg on the highway, the electric power steering system saves the equivalent of approximately one tank of gas each year.
"With the outstanding interior execution and comfort, the stunning exterior design, numerous chassis improvements, and the connectivity to the outside world, the new Equinox is the favorite ride among our engineers," said Tim Herrick, chief engineer. "I have to pull the keys out of their hands in order to take it for a spin myself."
Chevrolet is one of America's best-known and best-selling automotive brands. With the largest dealer network in the United States, Chevrolet delivers more-than-expected value in every vehicle category, offering cars and trucks priced from $12,120 to $103,300. Chevy delivers expressive design, spirited performance and great value with standard features usually found only on more expensive vehicles. More information on Chevrolet can be found at www.chevrolet.com.
SPECIFICATIONS
Overview
|
Models: |
Chevrolet Equinox LS, LT and LTZ; FWD and AWD |
|
Body style / driveline: |
five-passenger, four-door SUV , front-engine, front- or all-wheel drive |
|
Construction: |
welded galvanized steel (except for hood and roof) monocoque |
|
EPA vehicle class: |
compact sport utility vehicle |
|
Manufacturing location: |
Ingersoll , Ontario, Canada |
|
Key competitors: |
Ford Escape, Jeep Liberty, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Santa Fe and Toyota RAV4 |
Engines
|
Type: |
2.4L DOHC I-4 DI |
3.0L DOHC V-6 DI |
|
Displacement (cu in / cc): |
145 / 2384 |
182 / 2994 |
|
Bore & stroke (in / mm): |
3.46 x 3.85 / 88 x 98 |
3.50 x 3.15 / 89 x 80.2 |
|
Block material: |
cast aluminum |
sand-cast aluminum with cast-in bore liners |
|
Cylinder head material: |
cast aluminum |
cast aluminum |
|
Valvetrain: |
DOHC, four valves per cylinder; variable valve timing |
DOHC, four valves per cylinder; variable valve timing |
|
Fuel delivery: |
electronic direct sequential fuel injection with electronic throttle control |
electronic direct sequential fuel injection with electronic throttle control |
|
Compression ratio: |
11.7:1 |
11.7:1 |
|
Horsepower |
182 / 135 @ 6700 |
255 / 190 @ 6500 |
|
Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm): |
174 / 235 @ 4800 |
214 / 290 @ 5600 |
|
Recommended fuel: |
regular unleaded |
regular unleaded |
|
Emissions controls: |
close-coupled catalytic converters; Quick-Sync 24x ignition system; returnless fuel rail; fast-response O2 sensor |
close-coupled catalytic converters; Quick-Sync 24x ignition system; returnless fuel rail; fast-response O2 sensor |
|
Estimated fuel economy |
21 / 30 (FWD) |
18 / 25 (FWD) |
Transmission
|
Type: |
Hydra-matic 6T45 six-speed automatic electronically controlled |
Hydra-matic 6T70 six-speed automatic electronically controlled with manual shift mode |
|
Gear ratios: (:1): |
|
|
|
First: |
4.58 |
4.48 |
|
Second: |
2.96 |
2.87 |
|
Third: |
1.91 |
1.84 |
|
Fourth: |
1.44 |
1.41 |
|
Fifth: |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Sixth: |
0.74 |
0.74 |
|
Reverse: |
2.94 |
2.88 |
|
Final drive ratio: |
3.23 (FWD) |
2.77 |
Chassis/Suspension
|
Front: |
independent strut-type with tuned coil springs; direct-acting stabilizer bar; hydraulic ride bushings |
|
Rear: |
independent four-link with coil springs and trailing arm; stabilizer bar; hydraulic link bushings |
|
Steering type: |
rack-mounted electric power steering with 2.4L; hydraulic power rack-and-pinion with 3.0L |
|
Steering ratio: |
18.1:1 (2.4L) |
|
Steering wheel turns, lock-to-lock: |
3.46 (2.4L) |
|
Turning circle, curb-to-curb |
40 / 12.2 (with 17- and 18-inch wheels) |
Brakes
|
Type: |
power front and rear vented discs, standard anti-lock brakes |
|
Rotor diameter x thickness |
front: 12.6 x 1.18 / 321 x 30 |
|
Total swept area (cu in / mm): |
front: 20.7 / 526 |
Wheels/Tires
|
Wheel size and type:
|
17-inch aluminum (std. with 2.4L) |
|
Tires: |
P225/65R17 all-season steel-belted radial blackwall tires |
Dimensions
Exterior
|
|
|
|
Wheelbase (in / mm): |
112.5 / 2857 |
|
Overall length (in / mm): |
187.8 / 4771 |
|
Overall width (in / mm): |
72.5 / 1842 |
|
Overall height (in / mm): |
66.3 / 1684 |
|
Track (in / mm): |
front: 62.5 / 1587 |
|
Approach angle (deg): |
14.8 |
|
Departure angle (deg): |
23.2 |
|
Breakover ramp angle (deg): |
16.5 |
|
Minimum ground clearance |
7.8 / 198.5 |
|
Ground to rear load floor |
28.8 / 731.2 |
|
Curb weight, base (lb / kg): |
3770 / 1710 |
|
Weight distribution (front / rear): |
58 / 42 |
Interior
|
Seating capacity: |
5 |
|
Headroom (in / mm): |
front: 39.8 / 1012 |
|
Legroom (in / mm): |
front: 41.2 / 1046 |
|
Shoulder room (in / mm): |
front: 55.8 / 1418 |
|
Hip room (in / mm): |
front: 55.1 / 1399 |
Capacities
|
EPA interior volume (cu ft / L): |
130.5 / 3695 |
|
Passenger volume (cu ft / L): |
99.7 / 2822 |
|
Cargo volume (cu ft / L): |
|
|
GVWR, standard (lb / kg): |
4960 / 2250 |
|
Payload, base (lb / kg): |
1190 / 540 |
|
Trailer towing maximum (lb / kg): |
1500 / 680 (2.4L) |
|
Fuel tank (gal / L): |
18.8 / 71.1 (2.4L) |
|
Engine oil (qt / L): |
5 / 4.7 (2.4L) |
|
Cooling system (qt / L): |
8.9 / 8.5 (2.4L) |

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
sydbot 12:28AM (12/21/2008)
Wow, I'm rather surprised that the V6's highway mileage almost drops 1 MPG per .1 increase in displacement versus the I4. Especially including the differences in final drive ratio.
Reply
真相創傷 5:46AM (12/21/2008)
CRUSH IT !!
BURN IT !!
LET IT BURN IN HELL !!
LIKE IT BURNS THE DEVILS FECES !!
Reply
EV-1 6:09AM (12/21/2008)
"The best stuff, though, is underhood .... "
EH !?
You mean the WORST stuff, right ?
"Stuffing" these fossile burners with every trendy electronic gadget they can think of, just goes to prove how disconnected from reality these pollution-mongers really are.
As if the stupid publlic would let the ATTENTION TO SUSTAINABLE TECH be diverted by flashing blinding options and tedious specification charts ...
Go Die! you overweight wasteful fossile fuel burners ;
your time is out !
Is it really a polluting environmental thug you want to show off before your neighburs ??
Americans = the worst polluters of the world ??
Reply
B-E-N 6:22AM (12/21/2008)
well i donno if th amricans re the polutest in the world but they focus onthe wrongt stuff imho
"Contemporary, ice-blue ambient lighting – featured within and surrounding the center stack, encircling the center-console cupholders and within the door pull cups – accentuates the cabin"
BoneHeadOtto 9:25AM (12/21/2008)
EV-1 youre right, They should skip the small SUV and instead purchase a electric 7 seater Smart car......oh wait those dont exist yet so shut the hell up.
This is a step in the right direction. No one thinks this is the solution from the future but putting direct injection in engines to make them more efficient and reducing displacement is a step in the right direction.
FYI - EPA emissions standards in the US are higher than those in Europe. That is why the european diesels cannot be sold here. They have not met emission standards until just recently. In Europe they drive mostly polluting Diesel that dont meet US standards for emissions. So who is the most polluting country???
RSR 7:25AM (12/22/2008)
Engines with Improved fuel economy, beating all its rivals. How is that worst? Look up the dictionary and see what worst means.
MW 6:57AM (12/21/2008)
It's the wave of the future. Don't let the recent downturn in fuel prices fool you.
Used Cars Richmond VA
Reply
Mike Z. 1:03PM (12/21/2008)
Assuming that the EPA numbers work out, I would be interested in seeing this paired with the BAS mild hybrid system. That would get it up to ~24/34. Which is better than what my 2004 Mazda 3 gets.
A small cheap suv that gets the same mileage as a midsized sedan. Sounds like a winner.
Reply
Max 9:39PM (12/21/2008)
It's still a bad gas mileage....30 mpg freeway is way too low for a compact suv like that. Look at the current Rav4, it gets much higher mpg. Why??
This suv should get 30 mpg combined, no less.
Sam Abuelsamid 8:24PM (12/21/2008)
Max, have you actually checked out the mileage of a current RAV4? According to the EPA the 2009 RAV4 with a 2.5L four cylinder is rated at 22 mpg city and 28 mpg highway. Again your preconceived notions about Toyota win out over reality.
BoneHeadOtto 9:38AM (12/22/2008)
@Max
sounds like Max didnt get the memo that EPA rating standards changed in 2008. The Rav-4 previously was rated at 24/30. With the correction it is now at 21/27.
But i gotta give that Rav-4 props for being an excellent car. The v6 gets 263hp 19/27mpg without requiring premium and it faster than a base parsche Cayanne. All for about $25k. That is one serious engineering feat!!!! Kudos to toyota. And Kudos to GM for offering something more efficient than the 4cylinder Rav-4
Max 6:13PM (12/21/2008)
30 mpg freeway still sucks for a compact SUV. Sorry. This should get 30mpg COMBINED, at least. Nice styling though.
Reply
sydbot 8:16PM (12/21/2008)
This thing is compact? Have you stood next to an Equinox? Not gigantic, but it makes an old Suzuki Samurai look like a Mini.
RSR 7:21AM (12/22/2008)
Max, name one compact SUV that gets combined 30 mpg with ICE. I checked its competitors - RAV4 like you mentioned, CR-V, Tucson, and so on - and this one gets the best Hwy fuel econ for 4-cylinder. It's so easy to do the fact check on this, yet you haven't. Ignorance is a bliss for you. Stay that way - that will keep you happy.
Mr.Oak 8:50AM (12/22/2008)
Hello All back from a year long hiatus. I like this car, not knocking it. What's this nonsense about mild-hybrids?
Here is my problem: Why is GM still fudging around with mild hybrids? I thought that GM's use of mild hybrids would cede once they got up to speed on their two-mode hybrids. Was I wrong to view two-mode hybrids as the next rung on the evolutionary ladder?
I thought it was quite an embarrassment to say that you are taking on Toyota, when the Malibu Hybrid that Mr. Wagoner drove to congress falls short of the Camry Hybrid by 7 mpg.
If progress is the name of the game, throw your resources behind the two-mode system. Stop squandering your "Limited" resources on a system that will at best, pull even with Toyota's and Ford's six year old technology. You already have the technology to leap-frog them, commit to the technology and EXECUTE.
Reply
Cmicasa the Great XvX 9:17AM (12/22/2008)
I think many are missing the point that this is getting better fuel economy than any SUV/CUV in Toyota's line-up including their Rav4.
Truth is if U wanna really get riled up please venture into looking at the Fuel economy of Toyota's SUVs compared to GMs.
I kno for a FACT that the smaller 260HPV8 4runner...yup I said 260HP 4Runner gets WORST mileage than my 320HP Tahoe...a vehicle with a WHOPPING 1200lbs more metal than the Toyota and can even carry more people than the 4runner.
One could even argue that for all intents and purposes.. if used properly... a decent 17/24MPG Lambda.. capable of carrying 7 people is more efficient than a Honda Fit... a vehicle only capable of carrying 4... as CARPOOLING and longer family trips would require an extra Honda Fit to move as many people.
Mike Z 9:21AM (12/22/2008)
The simple answer is that the 2-mode system adds about a $5000 premium, while the mild hybrid is maybe $800. Now combined the mild hybrid with an advanced engine, 6-speed, and removing parasitic loads--it might be possible to get a decent mileage increase for less money.
Cmicasa the Great XvX 9:29AM (12/22/2008)
2 Mr.Oak...
I agree... I think the current BAS hybrid is pointless when U consider that GM's non-hybrid 2.4L Malibu LTZ gets damn near as good fuel economy on the road as the Mild Hybrid does... but for the cost difference between the two one could easily see that the Mild Hybrid is still a viable answer to need for even better F/E.
Rest assured tho... in 2010 the second generation BAS is supposed to debut, making it as efficient as the current Synergy-Drive in the Camry for still a lower cost. E-FLEX (Volt) will also bow next year, and based on this new 2.4L Di engine... we could see a BAS II Malibu that will be just as capable as the 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid for less money.
the BAS II is supposed to boost the current Mild Hybrids by 20-25%... meaning a current Malibu Hybrid getting 26/34MPG would see 33/43MPG... using the CURRENT engine. Using the NEW engine with Direct Injection and the use of the 6speed, one would more than likely see an additional 15% gain... meaning a 38/45MPG car.
Mr.Oak 11:52AM (12/22/2008)
@Cmicasa: I get your point, and understand the economics. However, my point is GM already has the Hybrid technology to surpass Ford, Toyota & Honda, but they continue to be last out of the gate.
It may better serve them to sell the two-mode hybrids at a loss TODAY, than to concede the market to the competition.
How much do you think it costs GM to develop two different systems? Initially selling the two-mode at a loss until you can produce enough units to drive the cost per unit down would have been smarter.
Committing the two-mode Hybrid system to vehicles that are not considered mainstream or bread & butter, is a waste of the technology. In the Tahoe and Escalade, GM will never sell enough of them to realize a profit.
Two-mode system in the Malibu & Lambda quads makes much more sense.
Willing to bet that a two-mode Malibu would outsell the Tahoe 100 to 1.
Sam Abuelsamid 5:52PM (12/22/2008)
Unfortunately given GM's cash burn rate of late, selling anything at a loss including two mode hybrids would not be a good idea.
At the time the product decision was made to apply the two- mode to the big trucks, those vehicles were main stream bread and butter products. Unfortunately for GM the market changed much faster than they could develop the products.