In the AutoblogGreen Garage: 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI

Click above for high-res image gallery of the 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
The car as we know it is being redefined. Hybrids have reintroduced electrons to the driving experience, and the rumble, shake and shimmy of internal combustion engines is being muffled and, in some cases, even silenced by cars like the Toyota Prius, 2011 Chevy Volt and Tesla Roadster.
For us to continue harnessing the energy of combustion under our hoods, we need to go much farther on a gallon of fuel. Enter Volkswagen and the diesel-powered passenger cars it's been selling in the U.S. since the late '70s, the latest of which is the 2009 Jetta TDI. Follow the jump to find out how VW's newest diesel fares against the electrified future of the automobile.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
Photos copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.
U.S. customers have largely ignored VW diesels. Those early examples had their quirks, including an engine rattle that sounded like a Peterbuilt and the propensity to puff out black smoke like a coal miner. Still, they could go twice as far on a tank of diesel compared to gas-powered cars and their engines lasted for hundreds of thousands of miles. A cult following keeps them going and many have been converted to run on vegetable oil and other bio-fuel blends.

It will be years before we know if the new 2.0L four-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine powering the Jetta TDI is as bulletproof as its predecessors, but we can tell you that its fuel efficiency is as impressive as ever. The EPA has rated the car at 30 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway. VW felt the EPA test cycle wasn't accurate and hired an independent company called AMCI to run more real world tests that yielded even better results: 38 mpg city/ 44 mpg highway.
We had the opportunity to take our TDI tester, which was *ahem* obviously provided BOSCH, on a trip from Cleveland to Pittsburgh. We were specifically curious to find out if achieving similar highway fuel economy numbers as the EPA and AMCI required a hypermiler's touch, or if our lead-infused feet could manage equally respectable numbers. Long story short: Our best average fuel economy was 46.1 mpg on the highway.


The current fuel economy champ in the U.S. is the Toyota Prius, which the EPA rates at 48 mpg city/45 mpg highway. What makes the Jetta TDI so impressive is that it doesn't require a complex hybrid drivetrain to achieve similar results. The straightforward design of Rudolph Diesel's engine and an interstate, highway or autobahn is all that's required. In fact, the Jetta TDI doesn't even require a cross-country trip to show its stuff. Hop on the highway and within minutes the trip information display will report an average of 40+ mpg. Though high-speed cruising is when this powertrain is most efficient, we also achieved results in the mid to high 30-mpg range while running errands around town.


We didn't resort to drafting semis or cruising at insufferably slow speeds, either. Our average cruising speed was around 65 mph, and the only trick we pulled was shifting into Neutral down steep grades to keep some of the momentum that engine friction would have sapped away. We couldn't help ourselves, as the simple average mpg readout in the trip computer display was all it took to get us hooked on trying to improve our efficiency.
Most Americans have never driven a diesel-powered vehicle, let alone compared one with a gas-powered competitor. We have and can tell you that the experience of driving a diesel is markedly different. Aside from being less fuel efficient, gas-powered four-cylinder engines have to work much harder to keep you cruising. They're often described as loud and "buzzy" because highway speeds require most to turn over at a rate of 3,000 rpm or more.

Volkswagen's new 2.0L turbodiesel, which was named one of Ward's Auto's Top 10 Engines of 2009, runs at just 1,800 rpm while cruising between 65 and 70 mph, so the Jetta TDI feels and sounds more like a car powered by a large, unencumbered V6. It's relaxed and anything but buzzy, accomplishing all its work below a 4,500-rpm redline that ensures things never get hectic underhood. Also gone is the knock, clatter and clang characteristic of past diesels. The Jetta TDI is as quiet as a luxury car on the highway, and though the diesel can be heard while idling, the entire car is eerily vibration free while sitting at a stop light.
The '09 model is also significantly quicker than VW diesels of the past, taking a tick above eight seconds to reach 60 mph, but even that metric doesn't tell the whole story. Though rated at only 140 horsepower, the engine's 236 lb-ft of torque means there's power aplenty. While off-the-line acceleration won't scare any sports cars, the Jetta TDI exhibits an effortless thrust when the right pedal is pushed. Whiplash inducing it's not, but the wave of power this little engine produces while underway is remarkable for its size.


Diesel engines have always been known their stump-pulling power, but they also have a reputation for being dirtier than gas engines. This became an issue a few years ago when California and the Environmental Protection Agency enacted their corresponding LEV II and Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions standards that erased the distinction between diesel- and gas-powered engines.
The modern diesel engine required major work to meet these new standards and gain access to markets in all 50 states, and most companies resorted to injecting a urea-based solution ahead of the catalytic converter that specifically targets the most harmful particulates like Nitrogen oxides (NOx). This solution, so to speak, was less than ideal because of the extra effort required to refill the solution at regular intervals. Volkswagen, in partnership with BOSCH, has developed a diesel engine for the Jetta TDI that's clean enough for sale in all 50 states without the use of a urea-based exhaust treatment system.
The trick is the use of a particulate filter in the exhaust system that requires zero maintenance from the driver. When the filter becomes full of harmful particulates, the engine's ECU will adjust the air/fuel ratio to raise exhaust temperatures high enough to burn them off. This process occurs every 300-500 miles and is largely transparent to the driver. Since raising exhaust temperatures requires a richer air/fuel ratio, fuel economy will suffer slightly during this process. On our way to Pittsburgh we noticed a sudden but temporary 1.5-2 mpg drop in fuel economy during which we assume the filter was being cleansed.

The Jetta TDI isn't all about saving us from buying a few extra barrels of foreign oil. It also happens to be a dynamic small car with above-average moves. The independent suspension with 16-inch alloys at all four corners exhibits typical German tightness with a solid ride that's not easily shaken. The standard, gas-powered Jetta has always been ahead of the economy car curve in this regard, and the TDI version is that much more so compared to cars like the Prius with its myopic focus on fuel efficiency at the expense of driving pleasure.
Another thing you're not going to get with a hybrid is transmission choices since most use a highly efficient CVT, or continuously variable transmission. Volkswagen offers two transmissions for the Jetta TDI: a good, old six-speed manual and six-speed DSG dual-clutch transmission with manual and Sport modes. Operating the row-your-own version is an above average experience for a small car, but the DSG is where you want to put your money. The latter will act like an everyday automatic if left to its own devices, but slip the stick over a notch and you're in control of precise shifts that occur quicker than you could make them yourself. VW deserves a double ding, however, for the lack of steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters and arranging the DSG's manual control as forward for up-shifts and backward for down-shifts.


There's still more decisions to make if you're considering the Jetta TDI, as VW also offers a SportWagen model in addition to the sedan. The four-door offers a 16-cubic-foot trunk, but the wagon goes above and beyond with 33 cu ft behind the rear seats and 67 when they're folded. While you may pay a small mpg penalty for the extra weight, the SportWagen TDI offers an unrivaled combination of utility and fuel efficiency in the marketplace. The EPA, however, reports the same results for SportWagen TDI as the Jetta TDI sedan: 30 mpg city/41 mpg highway.

For most, the decision to buy an exceptionally fuel efficient car like the Jetta TDI has less to do with making Mother Earth your BFF than saving money on fuel costs. The irony is that breaking the 40-mpg barrier adds a significant price premium to the up front cost of a car. In the case of the Jetta, the TDI version carries an MSRP of $22,270 versus the comparably equipped, gas-powered SE model that starts at $20,095. You may have noticed, however, that the Jetta TDI also qualifies for a $1,300 tax credit that more than halves the up front price premium, though that will only apply for the first 60,000 units sold.
Then there's the cost of diesel fuel to consider. When we topped of our tank, the price of diesel at our local station was $3.70/gallon versus $2.60/gallon for regular unleaded. Prices for both fuels have fallen since then, but the national average for diesel is still higher at $2.24/gallon versus $1.89/gallon. You will, however, go much farther on a tank full of diesel. Using EPA numbers, a Jetta TDI with 14.5 gallons of diesel could conservatively travel 595 miles on the highway before hitting empty, whereas our real world experience of over 46.1 mpg equates to 668 miles. A manual-equipped Jetta SE using a gas-powered 2.5L five-cylinder engine with 14.5 gallons of regular unleaded would stop on the highway after 450 miles.

The Jetta TDI has won us over because it offers what no hybrid on the market does: flexibility. Not only does it come in sedan or wagon form with your choice of transmission, but its mere existence represents an alternative for car shoppers who want efficiency, but not at the expense of enjoying the car they drive.
Volkswagen will add to this equation by offering a TDI version of its Rabbit hatchback this fall using the same 2.0L TDI engine, and may also sell a street version of the Jetta TDI race cars that compete in the Jetta TDI Cup. There's also the Touareg V6 TDI on sale now and the Aud A3 TDI arriving later this year for those who need more utility or want extra luxury.
The 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI is a push back against our future of electrified motoring, and VW/Audi will soon be offering more diesel-powered models in the U.S. than ever before. A world that has silenced the sound of pistons pumping is not preordained, and the Jetta TDI proves that there is a way to meet stricter fuel economy standards without sapping the fun of driving from point A to point B with as many turns in between as possible.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
Photos copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
BillySharps 12:58PM (2/09/2009)
I want one
Reply
Mark 1:07PM (2/09/2009)
i may start something with this, but I don't think you should have shifted to neutral to go down the hills. With the transmission in neutral, you required fuel to keep the engine idling. With the transmission in gear and performing engine braking, the fuel might be 100% shut off by the engine controls.
I'm not sure about this one.. .maybe someone with direct knowlege can weigh in.
I have an '03 Jetta TDI with 141k miles. It achieves 47 us mpg for my lifetime average. so in terms of only fuel economy this new model is quite a bit down.
Reply
BrianM 1:41PM (2/09/2009)
I'm sold on the VAG diesels with my '01 Jetta TDI. So my wife and I are eagerly awaiting the A3 in diesel to compliment our trusty ole Jetta and rarely used Toyota truck.
I'm not a hypermiler by any stretch, and like Mark I have a lifetime average of 48mpg over 170k miles. So it's a little bumer that the efficiency took a hit, but it's in the 50HP increase over our generation of cars (I'm Perfectly happy with the claimed 90hp my car was supposed to have). The fact that it's also cleaner is nothing to shake a stick at either.
But I'm in the choir. What I want is for more people to see that there IS a viable option that they had not previously considered. I don't see Diesel as the end all, be all (though wouldn't a diesel PEHV be a treat?), just as one of those things that helps bridge the gap to the next really viable option.
Reply
Rain 2:12AM (2/12/2009)
Well Bryan,
Apparently We are not the only ones to think about this.
If You were to combine the simplicity of a Rotary with the efficiency of diesel fuel
coupled to a small Genset then it would be a very small,lightweight and reliable generac for a Hybrid vehicle.
Freedom Motors has done just that and is in the process of testing it for feasibility inside a specially modified Honda Civic from AC Propulsions(The Tesla uses this technology).
Now I can already hear the detractors coming up with multiple reasons why this is bad,
the dirty,thirsty nature of the Wankel-NSC-Mazda is alone enough to justify many arguments but,Freedom has basically crossported the rotors so that the fuel is passed back and forth between the peri-trochoids(roughly the peanut shaped combustion chambers,if You will)and is burned off in an intelligent Emission Gas Recirculation System.
This approach has reduced emissions and even the exhaust noise and temperature
to acceptable levels for a HEV and it can run on basically anything.
Here is a link to the stats on the engine and very little information on the car itself:
http://www.freedom-motors.com/hybrid.html
I can only say that One can hope.
Jon 3:22PM (2/09/2009)
Overrated car. If you inquire about one of these at a dealer, they'll act like they're sitting on a pile of gold. Especially with the tax credit. Not the attitude I really want to see since I know simple math and it doesn't save me much more on gas due to prices then a nondiesel, which are terrible on gas to begin with
Reply
Joe Honsberger 4:38PM (2/09/2009)
I have a 2004 TDI wagon which I have run on B99 for 90,000 miles. The bio is reprocessed fryer oil. I sure wish I could run the new diesels on B99.
Reply
madprof44 7:44PM (2/09/2009)
I can figure it out myself, but in an article that explicitly compares diesel and gas burning versions of the same sedan where is the cost-per-mile comparison? That's an easy one, and out of all the indicators of possible success is probably the most important. It also is relevant to those interested in policy issues, given that the cost difference is due more to government policy than to market viability. The heavy lifting would be cost-per-expected-lifetime of each engine, but is it too much to expect in an article that goes into detail on every other issue?
Reply
MarcV 6:18PM (2/09/2009)
Nice to see more attention being paid to diesels. Apparently however, the new TDI doesn't work well with the higher blends of biodiesel, which is what a lot of us would want to run in it. The cover story in the current issue of BiodieselSMARTER has a good road test of this car running on B100. See http://www.biodieselsmarter.com/. With an ASTM standard for Biodiesel having been around for awhile now, and new sustainabilty principles being promoted by the National Biodiesel Board, it's time for the manufacturers to embrace it for it's many advantages over petro-diesel. Ok, most manufacturer's have B5 certification now but lets engineer the engines and emission systems to move towards B20 and then higher blends to B100. Why settle for only burning less imported oil when we could do so much more?
Reply
Sam 6:30PM (2/09/2009)
To : Jon,
Obviously diesel prices vary in different areas, but where I live Diesel makes sense. I drove an 00' TDI. It costs me 7 dollars a day to go to work round trip. If I were to drive my wifes elantra '07, The exact same trip would cost me 12 dollars to drive round trip. That even with a 10% premium on Diesel fuel. If people were to do even more math they would realise that the Diesel will hold it's Resale value 20-30% over a similar Gas model over the years. Also maintenance is cheaper on the diesel as oil change intervals are extended. 15,000 km vs 5,000 km.
You might say oh well the hyundai oil change is only 30 dollars and the Vw oil change is 65. Well, lets do the math.
$30 X 3= $90 for 15,000km for Hyundai
$65 X 1= $65 for 15,000km for Vw
Interesting how that works.
Reply
Ron Rosenbaum 8:23PM (2/15/2009)
...and VW pays for maintenance (including oil!) for the first 3 years!
M1EK 11:15AM (2/10/2009)
The tone of the article implies that you have to hypermile a Prius to get mid-40s; when, actually, that's what you get if you jackrabbit it with the A/C on. Hypermiling gets you upper 50s and beyond.
Also, the implication that this new diesel is no longer dirtier than gas engines is misleading. New gas engines are still far cleaner than even "clean diesel", and hybrids cleaner still.
Reply
wxman 11:47AM (2/10/2009)
M1EK - Upon what are you basing your assertion that "New gas engines are still far cleaner than even "clean diesel", and hybrids cleaner still"?
Noah 11:51AM (2/10/2009)
Everyone knows that the title "clean diesel" refers to the comparison to old diesels. In comparison to gas engines, they produce more Nox and soot (still, very little), but less CO2 due to less fuel actually consumed.
M1EK 11:55AM (2/10/2009)
wxman, on the fact that the Tier2-Bin5 standard is not as strict as the one many gas engines can now meet. Hybrids like the Prius usually do far better (certified at Tier 2 Bin 3 but clearly capable of more since it's also SULEV/PZEV and in a higher bin in CA).
M1EK 11:56AM (2/10/2009)
Noah, language like this:
"Diesel engines have always been known their stump-pulling power, but they also have a reputation for being dirtier than gas engines.[...]"
and then going on as it does can and does confuse people into thinking "clean diesel" is as "clean" as the typical new gas engine.
wxman 12:22PM (2/10/2009)
M1EK - You really can't assess the relative environmental impacts of specific vehicles based on the EPA emission bins or CARB cert classifications they meet. Emission regs are LIMITS, and arbitrary ones at that. There is no credit given for significantly exceeding one or more of the criteria pollutants. Most vehicles meet the limits by a wide margin, some more than others.
In my opinion, the only way to legitimately evaluate the emissions is to look at the actual certified emissions data. They're available from both EPA and CARB.
If you look at the certs for both the 2009 LEV II PZEV Prius and the 2009 LEV II ULEV Jetta TDI, you'll find there's very little difference overall, especially if you take evaporative emissions into account. The Jetta TDI is near or below SULEV limits for all criteria pollutants with the exception of NOx (which is what throws it into Bin 5 rather than Bin 2 or 3 or SULEV).
M1EK 1:23PM (2/10/2009)
wxman, NO2 is a very important emission - and, yes, if you emit that much NO2, it's a bit of an oxymoron to claim to be "clean".
wxman 4:40PM (2/10/2009)
M1EK - I'll grant you NO2 is a pollutant of concern (although not all NOx is NO2), but hydrocarbon emissions are even more of a concern, especially in metropolitan areas, since they are the primary ozone precursor. The PZEV Prius has higher HC emissions than the ULEV Jetta TDI if you include vehicle evaporative emissions (which certainly should be considered). And this doesn't even include the indirect VOC emissions from the distribution of gasoline (diesel fuel has relatively very low volatility).
Reductions in ambient NOx does very little in these urban environments ("VOC-limited") and can actually cause ambient ozone levels to INCREASE. This is something that even EPA acknowledges. See the "weekend ozone effect" or "NOx disbenefit" for more information.
M1EK 4:43PM (2/10/2009)
I have never heard the Prius claim re: evaporative emissions - a citation would be helpful. The Prius does have a special bladder (which is often a pain in the @ss if you're trying to measure fuel economy yourself) which is supposed to reduce evaporative loss beyond that of 'normal' gas engines.
And if you're going into indirect emissions, you have to consider the fact that diesel refining is a far dirtier activity than is gasoline refining. Probably a wash on the indirect emissions front given that.
wxman 5:06PM (2/10/2009)
It does reduce evap emissions, but they're still not zero.
Here's a comparison on the CARB-certified regulated emissions for the 2009 Jetta TDI and the 2009 Prius...
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/cert/pcldtmdv/2009/volkswagen_pc_a0070279_2d0_u2_diesel.pdf (ULEV II Jetta TDI)
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/cert/pcldtmdv/2009/toyota_pc_a0140628_1d5_pz_hevge.pdf (AT-PZEV II Toyota Prius)
(Grams/mile)
Emission.................VW Jetta TDI...........Toyota Prius
NMHC/NMOG..............0.014.........................0.009
CO................................0.5.............................0.1
CO @ 20*F..................----.............................1.5
NOx.............................0.04............................0.01
Highway NOx...............0.03............................0.01
PM...............................0.001..........................----
HCHO..........................----...............................----
US06 HC+NOx............0.13............................0.03
US06 CO.....................0.02.............................0.0
SC03 HC+NOx............0.12............................0.04
SC03 CO.....................0.02.............................0.1
VEH. EVAP..................----............................0.013
The evap emissions of the Prius actually exceed the "tailpipe" HC emissions by almost 50%.
You asked me for a reference on Prius' evap emissions, now I'm going to ask you if you have a reference on "diesel refining is a far dirtier activity than is gasoline refining", because it's my understanding that diesel refining requires less energy than gasoline, even ULSD.