GM's OnStar EV Lab opens its doors, loves the Chevy Volt

OnStar EV Lab - Click above for high-res image gallery
One of the features that GM is promoting with the Chevy Volt, due late next year, is a completely new level of connectivity for the plug-in hybrid. Well, completely new isn't quite right. The Volt will certainly communicate with the grid and with GM in new ways, but the underlying OnStar technology that will make all of this possible isn't new at all. It's a decade old, and the updates to the ninth-generation OnStar system that will be in the Volt would not be possible without years of testing and development. The system is also helping GM test the Volt and it came in handy during the recent eight-Volt, multi-state test drive. Read on after the jump to find out how OnStar xo's the Volt.
Gallery: OnStar EV Lab
OnStar has been used in the past to improve fuel economy (as have competing systems), but the way that the Volt will use OnStar goes well beyond checking tire pressure. For one thing, GM is working with the EDTA to collect data from utilities across the U.S. about pricing and off-peak charging availability. This takes a tremendous amount of time, but will make the system have real value to Volt customers, once the nationwide roll-out begins (likely sometime in 2011). The car will be able to integrate with utilities across the country, but exactly how will be determined over the next year. The Volt and OnStar will also be exported to China at some point, but GM didn't say how they are integrating with the state utilities there.

OnStar in the Volt
The Volt in the lab had a grand total of eight miles on the odometer. Even brand new, this Volt wasn't all dolled up (note the black duct tape on the rear) because GM is getting ready to send some of these vehicles on a date with a crash test wall. Nonetheless, inside the car everything was where it needed to be.
The IVER Volts have the production-intent OnStar technology in them, and the OnStar EV team is accessing information from about 25 percent of the Volts on the road. Currently, the lab is pulling data from 19 Volts; it was 17 last week. Each of the 19 Volt's in the current test has 20 modules that can send data points to the OnStar center. Before the first production Volts hit the market late next year, GM expects to have collected about a million data points (in the first 59 days of the test, they have gotten just under 80,000). In those production vehicles, OnStar will be a prominent selling point. So much so that OnStar features will likely be introduced in the Volt and then rolled out in other GM vehicles.
How does it help GM? How might it help Volt drivers?
Tony Posawatz compared the constant OnStar diagnostics to a person going to see a doctor. Instead of the nurse checking heart rate, blood pressure and temperature before the doctor arrives, these numbers would be available to the doctor all the time. For the Volt testing, the important information is being fed to the engineers all the time. Currently, the OnStar testing is, as might be expected, quite focused on the health of the battery and keeps an eye on things like the state of charge, temperature, and the cooling system. Currently, the OnStar network does have the ability to "reach out and touch the vehicle," but GM is being tight-lipped about how, exactly this might be used in the Volt to offer firmware upgrades or other options.
Aside from the way the battery is working, GM is trying to understand where people might want on-the-go charging units to be placed (work? shopping areas? etc.) but believes that the number one charging station will be the home. To see if this is appropriate, GM pulled real data from thousands of OnStar-equipped vehicles over the last week, and calculated what would have happened had they all been Volts. These vehicles were a representative sample, which in this case means the random drivers were selected from areas where GM expects initial interest in the Volt will be high. GM has previously said that it has its eye on "early adopter" cities like San Francisco and Washington, D.C. to sell the Volt at first, so the sample might have included drivers from these areas. The charts show how drivers use their cars. In these charts with blue and green data sets, the green represents miles that could be driven in all-electric mode, the blue is when the range extender would come on. In this chart, the dark green is the extra EV miles that could be driven with a bit of opportunity charging during the day. The take away point is that GM found that 90 percent of the customers would drive 90 percent of the time using only the battery.
Like with other plug-in vehicles, Volt drivers will be able to set when they want their vehicle to charge and interact with the smart grid. Low-cost nighttime charging will be the cheapest way to fill up the battery pack but there will be ways to tell the car to make sure the charge is completed by a particular time no matter what the energy costs.


GM's attitude about pure EVs
At the AltCar Expo in Santa Monica recently, GM said that it might be possible that they'll sell customers Volt bodies with the battery pack but without the range extender. Posawatz was very cool to this idea when we followed up with him, but did say that the future is wide open and that the Volt team is investigating all sorts of ways to best charge the battery with the range extender (sterling engine, using a smaller ICE, etc.).
In the OnStar EV Lab, GM was very, very disparaging of the 100-mile range of some upcoming pure electric vehicles. According to its test data, GM believes that 30 percent of drivers need to go more than that in a day and so would be stranded with a 100-mile range. Another 20 percent are afraid of running out of energy and would let their range anxiety dissuade them from getting an electric car with that range. So, GM says, half of the people won't be served by a car like the Leaf. Of course, this means that half of all drivers would be fine with a Leaf on a day-to-day basis.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
PopSmith 8:50PM (10/20/2009)
I'm a bit confused on their numbers for pure-electric driving.
"The take away point is that GM found that 90 percent of the customers would drive 90 percent of the time using only the battery."
However, it's later stated that "GM believes that 30 percent of drivers need to go more than that in a day and so would be stranded with a 100-mile range."
Are the "30 percent" really 3 percent (30% of 10%) of all drivers?
I wonder what GM would say about a 160-mile (or 230-mile) range such as the one in the Model S coming in a few years. I'd say their main argument would be "No range extender means your "Stranded" after 160 miles".
However, I don't know anyone who would regularly need to travel more than 160 miles in a single day.
Reply
Sean C 9:37PM (10/20/2009)
I was wondering the same thing.
If 90% of the drivers are fine with the 40 mile electric only range, 90% of the timet, then a 100 mile range EV would probably suit a large percentage of them 100% of the time. I've always thought that for early adopters (people willing to get a BEV in the next 5 years), they would likely a) be okay with the 100 mile range option because they don't need to travel more than that in a single day, and/or b) have a second car for times when they may need to go further. Also, for many commuters, there is probably a good chance of being able to charge during the work hours meaning that range would be effectively doubled.
I think the volt is a great idea, and I hope it sells millions, but I also believe there will be a place for early adopters to get BEV's off the ground. They also don't need to sell in huge volumes initially, as battery tech is steadily improving. Volumes can ramp up as battery tech improves.
Chris M 11:01PM (10/20/2009)
Closer to 30 percent on any given day. Consider that 90% of drivers usually drive less than 40 miles 90% of the time, but 10% of the time they need the range extender.
Then figure that the other 10% of drivers usually drive more than 40 miles on most days.
Hmm, my calculations indicate that should be 19%, not 30%, but maybe I've miscalculated somewhere.
Sebastian 1:01AM (10/21/2009)
Sorry I didnt' make it clear. The 90 of 90 are numbers from the 'representative sample' of people who GM thinks would buy a Volt (i.e., who live in an urban/suburban area and can charge at night). The 30 and 20 percent numbers are what GM believes about all the drivers across the U.S.
PopSmith 1:13AM (10/21/2009)
Sebastian, thanks for clearing that up.
Stew 11:16PM (10/20/2009)
I may be in the minority here but I would prefer to just drive my vehicle in anonimity thank you.
The way they're describing it...
"these numbers would be available to the doctor all the time", "car will be able to integrate with utilities", "OnStar network does have the ability to "reach out and touch the vehicle", "this might be used in the Volt to offer firmware upgrades or other options"
...sounds like what happens when a computer gets infected with adware and spyware.
Again, I realize I'm probably in the minority.
Stew
Reply
Ignatius 12:22AM (10/21/2009)
It could also be used to recover your vehicle if stolen. All that technology does have a use...
Ralph 2:53AM (10/21/2009)
You may be in the minority, but I am with you on this. It's disquieting to know that a program and associated personnel have the ability to monitor your car's every move. I don't know how GM markets On-Star, but I wonder if you will be able to get the car without this system (or at least be able to disable it).
ozyran440 9:28AM (10/21/2009)
You see, once adware infects the system, companies like ESET, Symantec, McAfee and Trend Micro will jump on the opportunity to come up with a security suite for the Volt, including "Anti-OnStar" firewall technology and "GM Pop-Up" blockers.
GoodCheer 9:31AM (10/21/2009)
Stew and Ralph:
If you guys are worried about being tracked, I hope you don't ever carry (let alone make or receive calls on) a cell-phone, or use a credit or debit card... cause every time you do your location is known.
Just sayin'
paulwesterberg 10:53AM (10/21/2009)
Well I certainly don't want to pay an extra $200-300 per year for cell service for my car. I already pay for a cell phone with a GPS which is always with me.
Bundling the service with their cars is one of the reasons why I have avoided GM products. The extra cost of the onstar system is added to the cost of every vehicle they sell. No wonder they went bankrupt.
Ralph 12:07PM (10/21/2009)
@GoodCheer
Yes, I am aware that a person can be tracked by cell or credit/debit card usage.
It isn't about hiding some kind of covert activities since a vast majority of our nation's drivers are law abiding citizens. I'm just uncomfortable with this surveillance system that has the potential to be abused.
Mel 1:53PM (10/21/2009)
look through the gallery. I think i found the big red privacy button just left of the steering wheel....
Ian 1:58AM (10/21/2009)
The real question is: will the Volt bring over the awesome alternator whine and other low quality audio features from the G8? 3" paper center speaker? Subs driven off rear channels so fader kills bass? Rear deck that rattles with bass when you get it back? And best yet: make it all integrated with the vehicle so your Volt forum mobile audio section is nothing but one hack after another to work around yet another turndstain GM electronics suite from the lowest bidder?
Never. Ever. Buying another GM ride.
Reply
DasBoese 8:21AM (10/21/2009)
(...)alternator whine(...)
*facepalm*
You might want to learn a bit about how this car works.
Epyx 9:05AM (10/21/2009)
You are pissed because the stereo is not up to your standards? Did you not listen to it before you bought it?
Besides, the G8 comes with a award winning Blaupunkt system so I find your comments an issue of personal preference rather than accurate criticism. You are severely contradicted by this review:
http://www.automobilesdeluxe.tv/blaupunkt/
Furthermore, what does any of this have to do with the Volt?