First Drive: VW Passat Ling Yu - The technology of tomorrow in the car of today

Volkswagen Passat Ling Yu - Click above for high-res image gallery
In many ways the automotive world – like most industries – runs like 19th century Europe: wars, skirmishes, diplomacy, assignations, shifting alliances, double dealing, imperialism. Everybody wants something the other guy has, and they'll occasionally exercise some ruthless tactics to get it. Of course, the obverse also happens: warring sects can work together to a singular end. That's what happens at the California Fuel Cell Partnership (CFCP), which we recently visited for a drive of the Chinese-engineered Volkswagen Passat Ling Yu and the smell of hydrogen in the morning.
Follow the jump to see what CFCP says the near future is going to be like.
Gallery: First Drive: VW Passat Ling Yu
Photos Copyright ©2009 Jonathon Ramsey / Weblogs, Inc.
The California Fuel Cell Partnership, tucked between train tracks and the highway in a quiet part of Sacramento, is where 31 government and industry partners work together to prepare that most elemental of elements for mass consumption. Volkswagen is one carmaker – alongside Chrysler, Daimler, GM, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan and Toyota – that works with CFCP on H2 vehicles.

VW isn't new to this. The company joined the CFCP in 1999 and began work on its high-temperature fuel cell. At the time, there were very few fuel cell vehicles on the road, the fuel cell pack in the Honda FCX weighed almost 500 pounds, and according to John Tillman, head of the CFCP, "We hoped to get down the road" (probably trying to get to one of the two fueling stations to be found anywhere on the planet). Today, they've got a fleet of about 300 vehicles and are working to build up to 100 fueling stations along California highways by 2010.
Nor is hydrogen the only alternative fuel on VW's research plate. At the center of the program is a source-to-powertrain tree that at first glance is so convoluted it could have been lifted from medieval royalty. Under "Source" come the fossil fuels – crude oil, coal, uranium, natural gas – and the renewable fuels: wind, water, solar, geothermal and biomass. Energy carriers derived from those include electric, hydrogen, gasoline, diesel, coal-to-liquid, natural gas-to-liquid, biomass-to-liquid and biogass. Finally, the powertrain options that run off them could be a fuel-cell with electric motor, battery with electric motor or conventional ICE. What that means as far as things you can put a key in and drive – or, at least, ones that researchers can drive – are the diesel-engined Jetta Blue TDI and Passat BlueMotion, the Passat TSI EcoFuel, the Touran CCS (Combined Comubstion System) and the automaker's Twin Drive plug-in diesel hybrid prototypes. VW is also developing SynFuel from natural gas and SunFuel engines that run on gas made from biomass and cellulose-ethanol. So, what we have is a 12-course meal of energy substitutions.

Our trip to the CFCP was for a sampling of the Passat Ling Yu, used to chase cyclists and runners during the 2008 Olympics. The prototype was developed in China with students and researchers at Tongji University, which was establised by Germans in 1907 as a medical school. The Passat Ling Yu is two generations old, having been unveiled in 2007, and uses the fourth-generation low-temperature fuel cell (LTFC) technology that was developed at the university. VW has been supplanting that for the high-temperature fuel cell stack (HTFC) it's developing and was used in the Tiguan Hymotion and Touran HyMotion. The more efficient HTFC operates at a higher temperature, and so needs less cooling machinery. The benefits are that it's more compact and less expensive.
We actually thought a day in the older vehicle would be convenient because it would help us establish a reference point and let us know how big the leaps are between generations. (If someone showed you a 1937 Victrola Talking Machine and told you it was two generations old, you wouldn't expect them to show up with an iPod next year.)


The Passat gets an 88 kW electric motor located on the front axle. It's powered by a stack of batteries beneath the rear seats, which are in turn juiced up by a 55 kW hydrogen fuel cell stack in the floor of the car. With 155 lb-ft of pull, the Ling Yu gets to 62 mph in 15 seconds, has a top speed of about 90 mph and a range of up to 146 miles. The CFCP figures that no hydrogen car will be ready for retail until it gets 300 miles between fill-ups, and the fuel cells themselves need to last 150,000 miles. They may be right, but on our visit, we wouldn't be going anywhere near that far.
Get in the Passat and... it's a Passat. Brown, spacious VW-ness. To turn the key is to call a mid-range, turbine-like whine into being. If the A/C is on and the car needs a little goose, the compressor will come on. Otherwise, that's it. If you're conversing with passengers and thinking about driving, you won't notice anything until the compressor bellows.




Put the car in gear, press the gas, and you start moving with just a slight rumbling from the fuel cell and bits under the floor. The whine, however, doesn't change. Sure, it takes 15 seconds to get to 60 mph, and in our other guise of piloting Bugattis and Porsches, that sounds like a Permian Age, but it was never frustrating. True, we kept to city streets, but we never noticed cars hankering to get around us – and after all, a Chevy Aveo takes almost that long.
The Ling Yu is utterly fine on the move. About the only thing to take note of, and that's only if you're interested, is the console screen that indicates the three paths of energy flow between the electric motor, batteries and fuel cell stack. The slightly rumbling floor was a feature during every acceleration, and there were little noises that peeped and thudded every so often, but these are the kinds of things you get when you drive an experimental vehicle.

It would be misleading to spend too much time writing about actually driving the Ling Yu. It isn't the fastest thing in the world, nor is it the slowest. It hums instead of revs. It rides fine. It stops fine. Oh, there is this bit: when you stop and shut it down, it emits an irate, hovercraft-like roar as the compressors expel water from the fuel cell stacks, eventually followed by the last sputterings of liquid flying out of the chromed tips that sounds like you're swigging the final drops of a milkshake up the straw.
But the point is this: driving the Passat Ling Yu is like, well, driving a Passat. Albeit a detuned one.
The full story doesn't make sense, though, until these other stories make sense: getting hydrogen efficiently and building the infrastructure. VW bills the Passat Ling Yu as "a sustainable solution for the future of individual mobility," but that won't be the case until the boffins figure out how to get more energy from hydrogen than it takes to get the hydrogen in the first place.




VW has placed its fuel programs in the wheel-to-well context, basing the CO2 emissions calculus at the beginning: primary energy demand (PED). The company's own chart measuring PED against CO2 has a sailboat in the lower left corner and a fuel cell vehicle (from electrolysis) in the upper right corner straddling the other middling options. But the fuel cell vehicle comes with an asterisk: that happens in 2015. This adds perspective to the company's claim that its high-temperature fuel cell won't be affordable and commercially ready until 2020.
The CFCP's Tillman said it is working on two approaches to extracting hydrogen: doing so with completely clean energy like solar or wind, and conducting electrolysis after the water has been pressurized.
"Electrolysis is dirty," Tillman said. "Water doesn't compress much, just a couple of percent. If you pre-pressurize the water to 5,000 or 10,000 psi and do electrolysis at that pressure, you get hydrogen at very close to the same pressure and [the process is] much more efficient. You don't have to compress the hydrogen. No one's done it on a large scale before and it's not really understood yet. It's difficult, but it's doable. If they pull it off then you've got something."


You have something, yes – but you still don't have a hydrogen infrastructure. In addition to the tens of pumps that the CFPC is lobbying to have built, Tillman believes home refueling could be the way to connect the infrastructure gap. "Honda has a home fueler and VW is working on one," Tillman said, "and we have our own home fueler concept."
So while we took a spin in the world of tomorrow with the Passat Ling Yu – and its mild driving habits make it a lot like the world of today – there remain a fair number of tomorrows before it can be called "everyday". The CFCP is committed to putting hydrogen on the board and in play, and the Passat Ling Yu, and Touran and Tiguan HyMotions, are worthy pieces.

As for that infrastructure, we got a little closer to home fueling when we discovered half of the Shell conventional gas station a few blocks from where we were had been torn down and replaced with a hydrogen fueling station. Hydrogen is here, and when it decides to show itself to the masses, certainly one of the badges it will wear is "VW".
As we listened to the compressor whine of the hydro-fleet after our test drives, DriverSide colleague Alison Lakin remarked, "Sounds like the future." It feels, though, a lot like today.
Gallery: First Drive: VW Passat Ling Yu
Photos Copyright ©2009 Jonathon Ramsey / Weblogs, Inc.


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
augustus 3:10PM (7/08/2009)
A positive article about fuel cells? I suppose the green masses will be breaking out their torches and pitchforks soon...
Reply
Alan 3:48PM (7/08/2009)
*SIGH*
Wake me up when I can buy one for something that's even close to affordable and when there's a network of refuelling stations close to me where the hydrogen is about the 10th of the cost per mile compared to gas, until then STFU.
Reply
Mike 4:34PM (7/08/2009)
Affordable? Network of fuel sources? 10th of the cost compared to gas?
That's all here now, but it's electric not hydrogen.
http://www.aptera.com/
Alan 4:52PM (7/08/2009)
I think that's the point I was making ;-)
I can understand why ABG has to report hydrogen stories but most of them are boring and seem to be more about spin than substance.
summazooma 7:03AM (7/09/2009)
(Sigh)
Fuel Cell vehicles are, in fact, a type of electric vehicle. Everytime somebody says that Electric is the future of transportation, not Fuel Cells, I feel like asking if that means that it doesn't matter how the electricity is generated or that you might have to find a plug to re-charge the batteries.
A Fuel Cell only does one thing in these cars and that is generate electricity that gets stored in the batteries before powering the motors as needed... That was, I think (perhaps too ambiguously) one of the points of the lead-in (listing "Source", "Energy Carrier" & "Powertrain Options"). Worth a re-read...
Put another way, those of us who are excited by the future prospect of Fuel Cell vehicles are in league, not in competition, with those who are pushing EVs...
Alan 7:39AM (7/09/2009)
Oh come off it, you're either incredibly stupid or incredibly deceptive. I think probably the latter, I expect you fully understand what the issues are and getting pedantic isn't big or clever. *SIGH*
zamafir 1:51PM (7/09/2009)
Alan's right. Call me when I can BUY a fuel cell car, say for $50,000. I'll be here in 2030-2050 when I can, so feel free to look me up. Also, we'll have the cake and eat it too, give me my fuel by means which don't use fossil fuels. Thanks.
Chris M 2:09AM (7/11/2009)
David Martin: I checked out that "ClearEdge Power" website, it turns out to be a 5 Kw fuel cell fueled by steam reformed natural gas, acting to provide both heat and power. To qualify, you must live in certain areas of California, and your electric power bills has to exceed $10,000 per year, A quick calculation indicates this unit would provide less than half your home power needs, and . It is only recommended for homes over 4,000 sq. ft., preferrably with pool or spa. Mansion row only, the average Joe need not apply. The price is not mentioned, but there is a $12,500 utility credit. It sounds like "If you have to ask, you can't afford it".
A rough estimate, given the power output and included steam reformer, H2 purifier, and power inverter, somewhere around $35K to $40K. For that kind of money, you could install a solar array that would provide even more power, plus solar water heating - and decrease, not increase, your natural gas bill. It's for someone with more dollars than sense, and quite frankly, I really don't consider it to be quite "practical" for home use.
BTW, a more conventional 5 Kw generator for home use cost about $1,700, and a 8.5 Kw standby generator just $2,050.
chris 4:08PM (7/08/2009)
Hydrogen = big oils big hope! Distract us from battery-electrics and kick the can down the road so they can pump out every last drop of black gold and fully write-off their sunk capital. That's what hydrogen is all about, and don't let anyone else tell you different. It would be much cheaper to install and electric infrastructure that it would hydrogen. And most of us have garages with plugs in them TODAY.
I don't want to read anything more about "the future" being hydrogen until people are actually buying hydrogen fuel cell cars for less than what you can buy a Telsa.
This is insulting to my intelligence.
Reply
win39 4:35PM (7/08/2009)
I think you are right, Chris.
There is an interesting discussion of the efficiencies of various alternatives:
http://www.efcf.com/reports/E04.pdf
Essentially what you get is 17 percent for hydrogen. Current diesel is over 25 percent. A diesel hybrid is 33 percent. Electric vehicle 66 percent.
None of the estimates take into account the cost of sequestering carbon if the hydrogen is separated from natural gas. It is just as efficient to use natural gas directly without the added cost of breaking it down for hydrogen.
So it starts to be obvious if hydrogen fuel cell is the choice the reason is not efficiency or cost. It will preserve the petroleum monopoly distribution model though. :-)
Alan 4:59PM (7/08/2009)
Absolutely. No more hydrogen stories that have no substance. So I guess that means not more hydrogen stories at all (or at least for a very long time).
I get so annoyed when there's no adaptation to circumstances, does it really matter whether it's hydrogen or EV that succeeds? All that matters is that we choose the cheapest most efficient path and that, by the laws of physics god damn it, has to be EV. So why don't they divert their billions if not trillions of dollars into that instead and help us get out of this hole we're in... grrrrrr.
Yanquetino 4:12PM (7/08/2009)
Questions:
- How far did you drive the vehicle, and did the gauges thus confirm that projected 146 mile range?
- Did VW inform you that this particular prototype cost about the same to build as a Honda Clarity? If not, what was the cost?
- Did Tillman give you any idea of how much their "home fueler concept" would cost, both the purchase and to use?
- Did he specify how that "home fueler concept" would extract the hydrogen? Would it also use that described method of first compressing the water, and then using electrolysis to separate the hydrogen under pressure?
- Did you refuel the vehicle at that Shell station a few blocks down the street? If so, how much did you pay for the hydrogen, and how much does that calculate per mile?
- Any idea where and how that Shell station gets its hydrogen?
- What was the psi of the vehicle's tank? What was it made of?
- Did Tillman specify anything about estimated losses from the tank over time?
Thanks!
Reply
McGreenGal 4:42PM (7/08/2009)
I've always liked VW cars. Germans really know how to engineer their vehicles, and I hope that other car manufacturers will follow in their footsteps!
Reply
Chris M 5:25PM (7/08/2009)
Well, by using an anemic underpowered H2 fuel cell, they did cut the cost a bit - but it will still be over a quarter million dollars each. Of course, that acceleration can only be described as "sluggish".
VW plans to use a "high temperature" fuel cell, that means either solid oxide or molten carbonate. Both of those can use other fuels directly, solid oxide is particularly adept at running on various hydrocarbon fuels. I suspect that VW will use those H2 research grants to develop solid oxide fuel cells, then if certain technical issues can be solved and the cost comes down enough they will produce it - running on unleaded or diesel or any combination thereof instead of that expensive and difficult to store H2.
Trying "high pressure electrolysis" to avoid compression energy losses has a major problem - the soluabiliy of both H2 and O2 in water increases with pressure, that means more H2 migrating to the O2 side and vice versa. Aside from the potential safety hazard of having O2 contaminating the high pressure H2 gas, there is an efficiency loss to that diffusion problem. I just hope they don't blow themselves up before realizing that.
Reply
Alan 5:56PM (7/08/2009)
But you have scientific knowledge of the real world, I don't think they are interested. In your opinion is EV the best path to take for moving personal transportation off fossil fuels?
David Martin 6:53PM (7/08/2009)
I don't really understand the extremely negative attitude prevalent here to fuel cell vehicles.
I am also a great fan of pure EV's and hybrids, and think that for personal transportation at least the most common technology will probably be this.
That does not mean it is not worth developing fuel cell vehicles, as you never really know how technologies will pan out until you have mastered them.
Many of the most competent companies in the world are pressing ahead with fc vehicles, such as VW, Volvo, Toyota and Honda.
I don't accept that these guys are dummies.
Fuel cell vehicles are at an earlier stage of development than battery driven cars, so of course they are outrageously expensive right now.
There is considerable progress though in reducing or eliminating precious metal use, which should eventually lead to lower prices.
At minimum fuel cells may be useful in trucks and buses, but their use in cars can't be ruled out.
It always pays to have more than one string to your technological bow, and I welcome the development of fuel cell technology.
Some readers here may not be aware that they are also coming into use to provide power to homes, using waste heat to provide hot water.
One way or another, investment in developing the technology seems likely to pay off, although perhaps in cars batteries may be the more usual solution.
Reply
Alan 7:55PM (7/08/2009)
You can't understand the negativity? How about people who, like me, have been enthusiatic about new technology for many years, who have followed the progress of using hydrogen as an energy carrier and thought 'yeah that sounds pretty good', only to find that after years of development and billions or trillions of dollars in investment that we've barely got anywhere, yet EV and plug-in EV have come on leaps and bounds in a very short period of time and without all the huge amounts of taxpayers money yet we still continue to see all these stories about hydrogen, hydrogen, hydrogen. I'm not saying stop doing research, I'm saying, divert all public funds from hydrogen to EV and stop ramming hydrogen personal transportation 'solutions' down our collective throats. We have waited, we have been patient, some of us have even been enthusiastic, but enough is enough. Provide the solution to the next generation of personal transporation soon or STFU.
David Martin 8:16PM (7/08/2009)
Solutions do not just appear on demand, and personally I follow progress with interest.
If anyone is not interested, it would seem to be easier for them to follow whatever does float their boat, rather than demand that those who remain interested in the technology should cease to discuss it.
Of course, it is always annoying when Government money is spent on technology which one does not have faith in, but fuel cells are hardly alone in this.
The use of fuel cells in housing units is here and now, and would seem likely to pay for investment in them by itself even if they are not used in transport:
http://www.clearedgepower.com/
Alan 8:30PM (7/08/2009)
Ok, fine, but we're not talking about homes are we? We're talking about cars, I mean come on, how many stories can you hear about we're going to do hydrogen cars in year X if breakthrough Y happens and well let's brush over some of those things, etc. etc. until people start to get annoyed? I know ABG have to publish the stories but there is nothing in he T&Cs that prevents me venting my spleen if I feel like it, and since I was as enthusiastic as anyone about hydrogen 3-4 years ago I feel I have earned the right to say I have monitored the 'progress', found it to be lacking and now want to concentrate on with all available data seem to be THE WINNING HORSE.
Blurg.
Alan 8:39PM (7/08/2009)
Oh - I forgot to mention, but I wouldn't be so annoyed if it didn't seem that we need an alternative to the ICE Pretty Damn Quick! You don't think so? Gas prices so high in the depth of a recession that can only be compared to the Great Depression? You know what I think the 'power that be' know the situation we are in but were hoping that things would just sort of 'work out' but that hasn't happened so that is why they are now going full speed for EV, and about time too. Yes, we all know EV isn't perfect but that's called ADAPTATION - it's what humans are good at (even if they do moan about it). So let's get with the program, look at the MACRO economic and environment issues and try to solve the problem *as best we can* ASAP and live with outcomes which makes things not as good as the old days...